The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Skill-Biased Technical Change

  • Giovanni L. Violante
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2388

Abstract

Skill-biased technical change is a shift in the production technology that favours skilled over unskilled labour by increasing its relative productivity and, therefore, its relative demand. Traditionally, technical change is viewed as factor-neutral. However, recent technological change has been skill-biased. Theories and data suggest that new information technologies are complementary with skilled labour, at least in their adoption phase. Whether new capital complements skilled or unskilled labour may be determined endogenously by innovators’ economic incentives shaped by relative prices, the size of the market, and institutions. The ‘factor bias’ attribute puts technological change at the center of the income-distribution debate.

Keywords

Capital–skill complementarity Elasticity of substitution Factor-neutral technical change Income distribution Information technology Innovation Learning Production functions Research and development Skill premium Skill-biased technical change Solow, R. Substitutes and complements Technical change Technology–skill complementarity Total factor productivity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to the CV Starr Center for research support.

Bibliography

  1. Acemoglu, D. 1998. Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1055–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D. 2002. Technical change, inequality and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 7–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion, P. 2002. Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica 70: 855–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autor, D., L. Katz, and A. Krueger. 1998. Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1169–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Autor, D., F. Levy, and R. Murnane. 2003. The skill content of recent technical change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 1279–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartel, A., and F. Lichtenberg. 1987. The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology. The Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caselli, F. 1999. Technological revolutions. American Economic Review 89: 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galor, O., and O. Moav. 2000. Ability biased technological transition, wage inequality within and across groups, and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 469–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garicano, L., and E. Rossi-Hansberg. 2004. Inequality and the organization of knowledge. American Economic Review 94: 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldin, C., and L. Katz. 1998. The origins of technology–skill complementarity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 693–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon, R. 1990. The measurement of durable goods prices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenwood, J., Z. Hercowitz, and P. Krusell. 1997. Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. American Economic Review 87: 342–362.Google Scholar
  13. Greenwood, J., and M. Yorukoglu. 1997. 1974. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 46: 49–96.Google Scholar
  14. Griliches, Z. 1969. Capital–skill complementarity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 5: 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hornstein, A., and P. Krusell. 1996. Can technology improvements cause productivity slowdowns? In NBER macroeconomics annual, ed. J. Rotemberg and B. Bernanke, Vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hornstein, A., P. Krusell, and G. Violante. 2005. The effects of technical change on labor market inequalities. In Handbook of economic growth, ed. P. Aghion and S. Durlauf, Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, L., and K. Murphy. 1992. Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krusell, P., L. Ohanian, J. Ríos-Rull, and G. Violante. 2000. Capital skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68: 1029–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review 80: 511–528.Google Scholar
  20. Nelson, R., and E. Phelps. 1966. Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. American Economic Review 56: 69–75.Google Scholar
  21. Solow, R. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni L. Violante
    • 1
  1. 1.