Skip to main content

Risk Sharing

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

Agents increase their expected utility by using state-contingent transfers to share risk; many institutions seem to play an important role in permitting such transfers. If agents are suitably risk-averse, then in the absence of any frictions the benchmark Arrow–Debreu model predicts that all risk will be shared, so that idiosyncratic shocks will have no effect on individuals; we call this full risk sharing. Real-world tests of full risk sharing tend to reject it; accordingly, researchers have devised models incorporating various frictions to try to explain the partial risk sharing evident in the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Allen, F., and D. Gale. 1988. Optimal security design. Review of Financial Studies 1: 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, D. 1992. Household composition, labor markets, and labor demand: Testing for separation in agricultural household models. Econometrica 1: 287–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. 1991. A simple test of consumption insurance. Journal of Political Economy 99: 957–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. 1992. Understanding consumption. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., and S. Lund. 2003. Risk-sharing networks in rural Philippines. Journal of Development Economics 71: 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F., J. Altonji, and L. Kotlikoff. 1996. Risk-sharing between and within families. Econometrica 64: 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, N. 1996. Implications of efficient risk sharing without commitment. Review of Economic Studies 63: 595–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E. 1998. Risk-sharing and information in village economies. Review of Economic Studies 65: 847–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E., J. Thomas, and T. Worrall. 2002. Informal insurance arrangements with limited commitment: Theory and evidence from village economies. Review of Economic Studies 69: 209–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, B. 1991. Full insurance in the presence of aggregate uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy 99: 928–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M. 1994. Risk-taking, global diversification, and growth. American Economic Review 84: 1310–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. 1988. Risk, implicit contracts and the family in rural areas of low-income countries. Economic Journal 98: 1148–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., and J. Stiglitz. 1970. Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R. 1987. Microfoundations of macroeconomics. In Advances in economic theory: Fifth World Congress, ed. T. Bewley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R. 1994. Risk and insurance in village India. Econometrica 62: 539–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ligon, E. (2018). Risk Sharing. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2357

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics