Skip to main content

Postmodernism

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

Postmodernism resists encyclopaedic definition. On the level of economic phenomena, debates have centred on postmodernity as a separate historiographic period. On the conceptual level, the work of prominent economists has been argued to resonate with postmodernist themes. Certain parts of behavioural and experimental economics have begun to display key postmodernist features. A small selfconsciously postmodernist literature draws from economics, literary criticism, and Continental philosophical traditions in its analysis of economic phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Backhouse, R.E. 1998. Should economists embrace postmodernism? In Explorations in economic methodology. From Lakatos to empirical philosophy of science, ed. R.E. Backhouse. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1976. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Legal Classics Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V. 1994. The economy as a text. In New directions in economic methodology, ed. R.E. Backhouse. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clower, R.W. 1995. Axiomatics in economics. Southern Economic Journal 62: 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series 4: 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullenberg, S., J. Amariglio, and D.F. Ruccio. 2001. Postmodernism, economics and knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.B. 2003. The theory of the individual in economics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, S. 1991. Are there any signs of postmodernism with economics? Methodus 3: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1992. The end of history and the last Man. London: Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gode, D., and S. Sunder. 1993. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero- intelligence traders. Journal of Political Economy 101: 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism: Or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G.S. 1991. Is individual choice less problematic than collective choice? Economics and Philosophy 7: 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1936. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaes, M. 2006. Keynes between modernism and post modernism. In The Cambridge companion to Keynes, ed. R.E. Backhouse and B.W. Bateman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, A. 1995. The conception of modernism in economics: Samuelson, Keynes and Harrod. Aldershot: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. 2002. Knowledge by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. 1979. La condition postmoderne. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. 1987 [1991]. Rewriting modernity. In The inhuman: Reflections on time, ed. J.-F. Lyotard. Trans. G. Bennington and R. Bowlby. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E. 1975. Late capitalism, Rev. edn. Trans. J. de Bres. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D.N. 1983. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 48–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D.N. 1994. Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D.N. 1999. Jack, David, and Judith looking at me looking at them. In What do economists do? New economics of knowledge, ed. R.F.J. Garnett. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, J. 1999. Look at me look at you. In What do economists do? New economics of knowledge, ed. R.F.J. Garnett. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine dreams. Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. 1945. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruccio, D.F., and J. Amariglio. 2003. Postmodern moments in modern economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. 1939. Interactions between the multiplier analysis and the principle of acceleration. Review of Economics and Statistics 21: 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C. 1984. Self-command in practice, in policy and in a theory of rational choice. American Economic Review 74: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R.J. 1989. Market volatility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, I., and U. Krause. 1986. Goethe’s Faust, arrow’s possibility theorem and the individual decision-taker. In The multiple self, ed. J. Elster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. 1970. Future shock. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee, A. 1954. A study of history. Vol. 9. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R. 1996. Modernism. New York: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodmansee, M., and M. Osteen. 1999. The new economic criticism. Studies at the intersection of literature and economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zein-Elabdin, E.O., and S. Charusheela. 2004. Postcolonialism meets economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Klaes, M. (2018). Postmodernism. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2343

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics