The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd


  • M. Klaes
Reference work entry


Postmodernism resists encyclopaedic definition. On the level of economic phenomena, debates have centred on postmodernity as a separate historiographic period. On the conceptual level, the work of prominent economists has been argued to resonate with postmodernist themes. Certain parts of behavioural and experimental economics have begun to display key postmodernist features. A small selfconsciously postmodernist literature draws from economics, literary criticism, and Continental philosophical traditions in its analysis of economic phenomena.


Animal spirits Choice theory Computational functionalism Critical rationalism Economic modernism Enlightenment Experimental economics Keynes, J. M. Postmodernism Rhetoric of economics Becker, G. S. Rhetoric of economics Methodology of economics Relativism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access


  1. Backhouse, R.E. 1998. Should economists embrace postmodernism? In Explorations in economic methodology. From Lakatos to empirical philosophy of science, ed. R.E. Backhouse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S. 1976. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Legal Classics Library.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, V. 1994. The economy as a text. In New directions in economic methodology, ed. R.E. Backhouse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Clower, R.W. 1995. Axiomatics in economics. Southern Economic Journal 62: 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series 4: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cullenberg, S., J. Amariglio, and D.F. Ruccio. 2001. Postmodernism, economics and knowledge. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, J.B. 2003. The theory of the individual in economics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dow, S. 1991. Are there any signs of postmodernism with economics? Methodus 3: 81–85.Google Scholar
  10. Fukuyama, F. 1992. The end of history and the last Man. London: Hamilton.Google Scholar
  11. Gode, D., and S. Sunder. 1993. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero- intelligence traders. Journal of Political Economy 101: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism: Or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kavka, G.S. 1991. Is individual choice less problematic than collective choice? Economics and Philosophy 7: 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keynes, J.M. 1936. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Klaes, M. 2006. Keynes between modernism and post modernism. In The Cambridge companion to Keynes, ed. R.E. Backhouse and B.W. Bateman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Klamer, A. 1995. The conception of modernism in economics: Samuelson, Keynes and Harrod. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Kusch, M. 2002. Knowledge by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyotard, J.-F. 1979. La condition postmoderne. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  19. Lyotard, J.-F. 1987 [1991]. Rewriting modernity. In The inhuman: Reflections on time, ed. J.-F. Lyotard. Trans. G. Bennington and R. Bowlby. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Mandel, E. 1975. Late capitalism, Rev. edn. Trans. J. de Bres. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. McCloskey, D.N. 1983. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 48–517.Google Scholar
  22. McCloskey, D.N. 1994. Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCloskey, D.N. 1999. Jack, David, and Judith looking at me looking at them. In What do economists do? New economics of knowledge, ed. R.F.J. Garnett. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Mehta, J. 1999. Look at me look at you. In What do economists do? New economics of knowledge, ed. R.F.J. Garnett. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine dreams. Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Popper, K.R. 1945. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Ruccio, D.F., and J. Amariglio. 2003. Postmodern moments in modern economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Samuelson, P.A. 1939. Interactions between the multiplier analysis and the principle of acceleration. Review of Economics and Statistics 21: 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schelling, T.C. 1984. Self-command in practice, in policy and in a theory of rational choice. American Economic Review 74: 1–11.Google Scholar
  30. Shiller, R.J. 1989. Market volatility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Steedman, I., and U. Krause. 1986. Goethe’s Faust, arrow’s possibility theorem and the individual decision-taker. In The multiple self, ed. J. Elster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Toffler, A. 1970. Future shock. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  33. Toynbee, A. 1954. A study of history. Vol. 9. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Weston, R. 1996. Modernism. New York: Phaidon.Google Scholar
  35. Woodmansee, M., and M. Osteen. 1999. The new economic criticism. Studies at the intersection of literature and economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Zein-Elabdin, E.O., and S. Charusheela. 2004. Postcolonialism meets economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Klaes
    • 1
  1. 1.