The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Ecological Inference

  • Gary King
  • Ori Rosen
  • Martin Tanner
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2336

Abstract

Ecological inference is a general statistical problem where a response variable is not available at the subject level because summary statistics are reported for groups only. It consists of merging information from different databases which are not linked to each other at the record level. We consider an election scenario where in each electoral precinct the fraction of voting-age people who turn out to vote, the fraction of black population and the number of voting-age people are observed. The proportions of blacks and of whites who vote are unobserved because electoral results and census data are not linked.

Keywords

Aggregation Ecological inference Likelihood Markov chain Monte Carlo methods Method of bounds Nonparametric models Statistical approaches 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Achen, C., and W. Shively. 1995. Cross-level inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adolph, C., G. King, M. Herron, and K. Shotts. 2003. A consensus position on second stage ecological inference models. Political Analysis 11: 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duncan, O., and B. Davis. 1953. An alternative to ecological correlation. American Sociological Review 18: 665–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodman, L. 1953. Ecological regressions and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review 18: 663–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodman, L. 1959. Some alternatives to ecological correlation. American Journal of Sociology 64: 610–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. King, G. 1997. A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. King, G., O. Rosen, and M. Tanner. 1999. Binomial-beta hierarchical models for ecological inference. Sociological Methods and Research 28: 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. King, G., O. Rosen, and M. Tanner, eds. 2004. Ecological inference: New methodological strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. King, G., O. Rosen, M. Tanner, and A. Wagner. 2003. The ordinary election of Adolf Hitler: A modern voting behavior approach. Online. Available at https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/nazivp.pdf Accessed 16 Aug 2006.
  10. Ogburn, W., and I. Goltra. 1919. How women vote: A study of an election in Portland, Oregon. Political Science Quarterly 34: 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosen, O., W. Jiang, G. King, and M. Tanner. 2001. Bayesian and frequentist inference for ecological inference: The R × C case. Statistica Neerlandica 55(2): 134–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Staniswalis, J. 2005. On fitting generalized non-linear models with varying coefficients. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 50: 893–902.Google Scholar
  13. Tanner, M. 1996. Tools for statistical inference: Methods for the exploration of posterior distributions and likelihood functions. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wakefield, J. 2004. Prior and likelihood choices in the analysis of ecological data. In Ecological inference: New methodological strategies, ed. G. King, O. Rosen, and M. Tanner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary King
    • 1
  • Ori Rosen
    • 1
  • Martin Tanner
    • 1
  1. 1.