The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Entropy

  • Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_233

Abstract

A concept of momentous importance for our understanding of physical reality though it is, entropy is one of the most poorly understood even by many physicists as a keen thermodynamicist, D. ter Haar, opined. A ‘far-fetched’ notion, ‘obscure and difficult of comprehension’ judged J. Willard Gibbs, the architect of statistical thermodynamics. It was apposite for Lord Snow to argue that some familiarity with the law of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics, separates the educated into two cultures. But this condition is quite curious given that the fountainhead of thermodynamics is anthropomorphic in a far more pronounced degree than that of any other branch of physics. No other physical concept belongs to our ordinary experience as inherently as heat and work or temperature and pressure. Indeed, thermodynamics is at bottom a physics of economic value as Sadi Carnot initiated it in his famous 1824 memoir about our efficient use of energy (Georgescu-Roegen 1971).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Boltzmann, L. 1895. On certain questions of the theory of gases. Nature 51: 413–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boltzmann, L. 1896–98. Lectures on gas theory. Trans. from German by S.G. Brush. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Brush, S. 1966. Kinetic theory, vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carnot, S. 1824. Reflections on the motive power of fire, and on the machines fitted to develop that power. Trans. and ed. R.H. Thurston. New York: Dover, 1960.Google Scholar
  5. Clausius, R. 1867. In The mechanical theory of heat with its application to the steam engine and to the physical properties of bodies, ed. T.A. Archer. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
  6. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1975. The measure of information: A critique. In Proceedings of the third International Congress of Cybernetics and Systems, Bucharest, August 25–29 1975, ed. J. Rose and C. Bilciu. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1980. Matter: A resource ignored by thermodynamics. In Future sources of organic raw materials, ed. L.E. St-Pierre and G.R. Brown. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1987. The promethean destiny of mankind’s technology. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  10. Planck, M. 1897. Treatise on thermodynamics. Translated from the 7th German edn by A. Ogg. New York: Dover, 1925.Google Scholar
  11. Prigogine, I. 1955. Thermodynamics of irreversible processes, 3rd ed. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Prigogine, I. 1980. From being to becoming. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. Rankine, W.J.M. 1881. In Miscellaneous scientific papers, ed. W.J. Millar. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
  14. Shannon, C., and W. Weaver. 1948. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  15. Thomson, W., and Baron Kelvin. 1882. Mathematical and physical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. von Helmholtz, H. 1882. On the thermodynamics of chemical processes. In Physical memoirs, vol. I, ed. H. von Helmholtz. London: Taylor & Francis, 1888–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen
    • 1
  1. 1.