The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Social Multipliers

  • Mary A. Burke
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2310

Abstract

Social multipliers can be thought of as indicators of the degree of strategic complementarity among interacting agents. A simple choice model is used to derive a formal expression of the social multiplier. The behaviour of the multiplier is described in relation to various factors, such as the strength of complementarity and topology of social interactions. Social multipliers are shown to help explain behaviours, such as criminal activity and labour participation, which vary greatly across social groups or across time out of proportion to variation in fundamentals. Challenges associated with identification of social multipliers are also discussed.

Keywords

Comparative statics Continuous and discrete choice models Identification Multiple equilibria Regression-based estimation Selection bias Social interactions Social multipliers Social norms Strategic complementarity 

JEL Classifications

D85 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Akerlof, G., J.L. Yellen, and M. Katz. 1996. An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 277–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcidiacono, P., G. Foster, N. Goodpaster, and J. Kinsler. 2005. Estimating spillovers in the classroom with panel data. Mimeo: Duke University.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G., and K.M. Murphy. 2000. Social economics: Market behavior in a social environment. Cambridge, MA: Belknap-Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, A.M. 2002. Locally interdependent preferences in a general equilibrium environment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47: 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binder, M., and M.H. Pesaran. 2001. Life-cycle consumption under social interactions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25: 35–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisin, A., U. Horst, and O. Ozgur. 2006. Rational expectations equilibria of economies with local interactions. Journal of Economic Theory 127: 74–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blume, L.E., and S. Durlauf. 2003. The interactions-based approach to socioeconomic behavior. In Social dynamics, ed. S. Durlauf and H.P. Young. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2001. Interactions based models. In Handbook of econometrics, ed. J. Heckman and E. Leamer, vol. 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  9. Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2007. Identification of binary choice models with social interactions. Journal of Econometrics 140: 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burke, M.A., G. Fournier, and K. Prasad. 2006. The emergence of local norms in networks. Complexity 11: 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke, M.A., and F. Heiland. 2007. Social dynamics of obesity. Economic Inquiry 45: 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen-Cole, E. 2006. Multiple groups identification in the linear-in-means mode. Economics Letters 92: 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, R., and A. John. 1988. Coordinating coordination failures in Keynesian models. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research 103: 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaeser, E., B. Sacerdote, and J. Scheinkman. 1996. Crime and social interactions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaeser, E., B. Sacerdote, and J. Scheinkman. 2003. The social multiplier. Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaeser, E., and J. Scheinkman. 2003. Non-market interactions. In Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and applications, eighth world congress, ed. M. Dewatripont, L.P. Hansen, and S. Turnovsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goldin, C., and L. Katz. 2002. The power of the pill: Oral contraceptives and women’s career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy 110: 730–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham, B. 2006. Identifying social interactions through conditional variance restrictions. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, B., and J. Hahn. 2005. Identification and estimation of the linear-in-means model of social interactions. Economics Letters 88: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hong, H., J. Kubik, and J. Stein. 2004. Social interaction and stock-market participation. Journal of Finance 59: 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoxby, C., and G. Weingarth. 2006. Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects. Mimeo: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  22. Ichino, A., and A. Falk. 2006. Clean evidence on peer effects. Journal of Labor Economics 24: 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ioannides, Y. 2006. Topologies of social interactions. Economic Theory 28: 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ioannides, Y., and J.E. Zabel. 2003. Neighborhood effects and housing demand. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 563–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manski, C. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60: 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Topa, G. 2001. Social interactions, local spillovers, and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 68: 261–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary A. Burke
    • 1
  1. 1.