The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Excess Volatility Tests

  • Stephen F. LeRoy
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2307

Abstract

Stock prices frequently undergo big changes that do not coincide with commensurate changes in fundamentals (earnings, dividends, interest rates). Shiller and LeRoy and Porter formalized the idea that price volatility is excessive relative to fundamentals by deriving the implications for price volatility of the hypothesis that stock prices equal the present value of discounted dividends. Subsequent discussion focused on the extent to which their results were subject to econometric problems. Also, analysts observed that the adopted version of the present-value model presumed constant discount rates, as would be the case under risk neutrality. This possibly biases the results.

Keywords

Asset pricing Equity premium puzzle Excess volatility tests Payoff volatility Present value Price volatility Price–consumption ratio Risk aversion Risk neutrality Samuelson, P. Vector autoregressions 

JEL Classifications

C5 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Campbell, J., and R. Shiller. 1988. The dividend–price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies 1: 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cutler, D., J. Poterba, and L. Summers. 1989. What moves stock prices? Journal of Portfolio Management 15: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fama, E. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance 25: 283–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Flavin, M. 1983. Excess volatility in the financial markets: A reassessment of the empirical evidence. Journal of Political Economy 91: 929–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilles, C., and S. LeRoy. 1991. Econometric aspects of the variance bounds tests: A survey. Review of Financial Studies 4: 753–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grossman, S., and R. Shiller. 1981. The determinants of the variability of stock prices. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 71: 222–227.Google Scholar
  7. Kleidon, A. 1986a. Bias in small-sample tests of stock price rationality. Journal of Business 59: 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kleidon, A. 1986b. Variance bounds tests and stock price valuation models. Journal of Political Economy 94: 953–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kocherlakota, N. 1996. The equity premium: It’s still a puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 42–71.Google Scholar
  10. LaCivita, C., and S. LeRoy. 1981. Risk aversion and the dispersion of asset prices. Journal of Business 54: 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. LeRoy, S. 1973. Risk aversion and the martingale model of stock prices. International Economic Review 14: 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LeRoy, S. 1976. Efficient capital markets: Comment. Journal of Finance 31: 139–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. LeRoy, S. 1989. Efficient capital markets and martingales. Journal of Economic Literature 27: 1583–1621.Google Scholar
  14. LeRoy, S., and W. Parke. 1992. Stock price volatility: tests based on the geometric random walk. American Economic Review 82: 981–992.Google Scholar
  15. LeRoy, S., and R. Porter. 1981. The present value relation: Tests based on implied variance bounds. Econometrica 49: 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LeRoy, S., and D. Steigerwald. 1995. Volatility. In Handbook of finance, ed. R. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, and W. Ziemba. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Lucas, R. 1978. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46: 1429–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehra, R., and E. Prescott. 1985. The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 15: 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Samuelson, P. 1965. Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review 6: 41–49.Google Scholar
  20. Shiller, R. 1981. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review 71: 421–436.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen F. LeRoy
    • 1
  1. 1.