‘Group selection’ is the biological term for the possibility that a characteristic that is beneficial to the group but possibly costly to the individual is evolutionarily successful. Although logically possible, it is generally viewed with scepticism by biologists. It is not problematic that group selection would favour an equilibrium whose payoffs dominated those of another, because there is then no conflict with individual selection within each group. Group selection might reject inefficient equilibria in a repeated game, for example. Since human societies can support rather arbitrary outcomes as equilibria, group selection could play a role in human evolution.
KeywordsAltruism Assortative matching Cooperation and its evolution Cultural transmission Darwin, C. Evolution Exchange Group selection Hunter–gatherer economies Individual selection Kin selection Natural selection Other-regarding preferences Prisoner’s dilemma Punishment Repeated games Trust
JEL ClassificationsC71 C73
I received helpful comments from Ted Bergstrom, Lawrence Blume, Sam Bowles, Steven Durlauf and Peter Sozou. I thank them without blaming them.
- Boyd, R., and P. Richerson. 1992. Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology 13, 171–195.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. 1845. Journal of researches into the natural history and geology of the various countries visited by H. M. S. Beagle. London: Henry Colburn. Online. Available at http://www.galapagos.to/TEXTS/J-OF-R.HTM. Accessed 23 Oct 2006.
- Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray. Online. Available at http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.html. Accessed 8 Nov 2006.
- Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. Online. Available at http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.html. Accessed 8 Nov 2006.
- Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. 1982. The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Grafen, A. 1991. Modelling in behavioural ecology. In Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach, 3 ed., ed. J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
- Kelly, R.C. 1985. The Nuer conquest: The structure and development of an expansionist system. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Seabright, P. 2004. The company of strangers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sober, E., and D.S. Wilson. 1999. Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wynne-Edwards, V.C. 1962. Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar