Skip to main content

Non-linear Time Series Analysis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

Since the early 1980s, there has been a growing interest in stochastic nonlinear dynamical systems of the form xt+1 = f (xt, xt−1, …, xtp) + σ(xt)εt, where \( {\left\{{x}_t\right\}}_{t=0}^{\infty } \) is a zero mean, covariance stationary process, f : Rp+1R, σ is the conditional volatility, and \( {\left\{{\varepsilon}_t\right\}}_{t=0}^{\infty } \) is an independent and identically distributed noise process. The major recent developments in nonlinear time series are described using this canonical model: (a) representation theory; (b) nonparametric modelling; (c) ergodic properties; (d) piecewise linear models; (e) volatility modelling; (f) hypothesis testing for linearity and normality; (g) forecasting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Albert, J., and S. Chib. 1993. Bayesian analysis via Gibbs sampling of autoregressive time series subject to Markov mean and variance shifts. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.G., T. Bollerslev, F.X. Diebold, and P. Labys. 2003. Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica 71: 579–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., and N. Shephard. 2002. Econometric analysis of realised volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 64: 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, B., and W.A. Brock. 1992. A nonparametric test for independence of a multivariate time series. Statistica Sinica 2: 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balke, N., and T. Fomby. 1997. Threshold cointegration. International Economic Review 38: 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., W.D. Dechert, J.A. Scheinkman, and B. LeBaron. 1996. A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric Reviews 15: 197–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, R.W. 1976. Volterra series and geometric control theory. Automatica 12: 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, V., and N.R. Swanson. 2005. Predictive density evaluation. In Handbook of economic forecasting, ed. C.W.J. Granger, A. Timmermann, and G. Elliott. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubechies, I. 1992. Ten lectures on wavelets. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: SIAM.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Lima, P. 1997. On the robustness of nonlinearity tests due to moment condition failure. Journal of Econometrics 76: 251–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diks, C. 2004. The correlation dimension of returns with stochastic volatility. Quantitative Finance 4: 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filardo, A.J. 1994. Business cycle phases and their transitional dynamics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12: 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franses, P.H., and D. van Dijk. 2000. Nonlinear time series models in empirical finance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A.R., and G. Tauchen. 1987. Seminonparametric maximum likelihood estimation. Econometrica 55: 363–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A.R., and G. Tauchen. 1996. Which moments to match? Econometric Theory 12: 657–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gençay, R., and W.D. Dechert. 1992. An algorithm for the n Lyapunov exponents of an n-dimensional unknown dynamical system. Physica D 59: 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghysels, E., A. Harvey, and E. Renault. 1996. Stochastic volatility. In Handbook of statistics 14: Statistical methods in finance, ed. G.S. Maddala and C.R. Rao. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.J., and J. Hallman. 1991. Nonlinear transformations of integrated time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 12: 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger, P., and J. Procaccia. 1983. Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D 9: 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J.D. 1989. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57: 357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J.D. 1990. Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics 45: 39–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B.E. 1996. Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64: 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D., and A. Pagan. 2002. Dissecting the cycle: a methodological investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics 49: 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J. 1982. Testing for Gaussianity and linearity of a stationary time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 3: 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C.J. 1994. Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching. Journal of Econometrics 60: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., H. Pesaran, and S. Potter. 1996. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics 74: 119–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig, H.-M. 1997. Markov switching vector autoregressions: Modelling, statistical inference and application to business cycle analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, C.-M., K. Hornik, and H. White. 1994. A convergence result for learning in recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation 6: 620–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, R., P. Saikkonen, and T. Teräsvirta. 1988. Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika 75: 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, S., and B. Mizrach. 1991. Nonparametric estimation of the correlation exponent. Physical Review A 88: 5298–5301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittnik, S., and B. Mizrach. 1992. Parametric and seminonparametric analysis of nonlinear time series. In Advances in GLIM and statistical modeling, ed. L. Fahrmeir, B. Francis, R. Gilchrist, and G. Tutz. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, S. 2000. Nonlinear impulse response functions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24: 1425–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J.B., and P. Rothman. 1996. Time irreversibility and business cycle asymmetry. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, R.J. 1980. Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics. New York: John Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shintani, M., and O. Linton. 2003. Is there chaos in the world economy? A nonparametric test using consistent standard errors. International Economic Review 44: 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shintani, M., and O. Linton. 2004. Nonparametric neural network estimation of Lyapunov exponents and a direct test for chaos. Journal of Econometrics 120: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takens, F. 1981. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In Springer lecture notes in mathematics, ed. D. Rand and L.-S. Young, vol. 898. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. 1994. Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T., and H.M. Anderson. 1992. Characterizing nonlinearities in business cycles using smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7: S119–S136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T., D. van Dijk, and M.C. Medeiros. 2005. Linear models, smooth transition autoregressions, and neural networks for forecasting macroeconomic time series: a re-examination. International Journal of Forecasting 21: 755–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, D., and P.H. Franses. 1999. Modeling multiple regimes in the business cycle. Macroeconomic Dynamics 3: 311–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank Cees Diks, James Hamilton, Sebastiano Manzan, Simon Potter, Phil Rothman, Dick van Dijk and Steven Durlauf for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mizrach, B. (2018). Non-linear Time Series Analysis. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2302

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics