The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Individualism Versus Holism

  • Harold Kincaid
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2295

Abstract

Issues about individualism and holism in economics surface because economics is committed to understanding both institutions and large-scale economic processes, in terms of constrained maximizing of individuals. Three key questions are at issue. Can a theory of individual economic behaviour capture everything we want to explain about the economy in principle? To what extent do our accounts of individual economic behaviour trump or constrain other economic explanations that are not directly about individuals? Are non-individual economic entities real, and what is their relation to individual behaviour? These questions are answered in light of developments in economics and in philosophy of science.

Keywords

Causation Evolutionary game theory Explanation Game theory Holism Hoover, K. Methodological individualism New institutional economics Rational expectations Reductionism Representative agents Schumpeter, J. A. Smith, A. 

JEL Classifications

B4 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Batterman, R. 2001. Devil in the details. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. 1976. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Deaton, A., and J. Muellbauer. 1980. Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fodor, J. 1974. Special sciences (or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthèse 28: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gordon, S. 1991. The history and philosophy of social science. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hellman, G., and F. Thompson. 1975. Physicalism: Ontology, determination, and reduction. Journal of Philosophy 72: 551–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoover, K. 2001. Causality in macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Janssen, M. 1993. Microfoundations: A critical inquiry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Kincaid, H. 1996. Philosophical foundations of the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1997. Individualism and the unity of science. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Ladyman, J., and D. Ross. 2007. Every thing must go. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martel, R. 1996. Heterogeneity, aggregation, and a meaningful macroeconomics. In Beyond microfoundations, ed. D. Colander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sattinger, M. 1993. Assignment models of the distribution of income. Journal of Economic Literature 31: 831–880.Google Scholar
  14. Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold Kincaid
    • 1
  1. 1.