The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Capital as a Social Relation

  • Anwar Shaikh
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_229

Abstract

Taken by itself, a sharp stone is simply a relic of some ancient and inexorable geologic process. But appropriated as a cutting instrument, it is a tool or, in a somewhat more murderous vein, a weapon. As a stone, it is a natural object. But as a tool or weapon, it is an eminently social object whose natural form is merely the carrier of the social relations which, so to speak, happen to have seized upon it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Alchian, A.A., and W.A. Allen. 1983. Exchange and production: Competition, coordination, and control, 3rd ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  2. Mandel, E. 1976. Introduction to vol. I of Capital by K. Marx (1867). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Marx, K. 1858. Grundrisse. London: Penguin, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Marx, K. 1867. Capital, vol. I. London: Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Marx, K. 1894. Capital, vol. III. Introduced by Ernest Mandel. New York: Vintage, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Rosdolsky, R. 1977. The making of Marx’s capital. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  7. Shaikh, A. 1982. Neo-ricardian economics: A wealth of algebra, a poverty of theory. Review of Radical Political Economics 14(2): 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anwar Shaikh
    • 1
  1. 1.