Abstract
Monopsony refers to the situation where a firm has some market power over the price it pays for its inputs, so that a higher price must be paid the more input is used. Monopsony could exist in any input market but is usually discussed in the context of the labour market. Employers will have monopsony power over their workers because of frictions in the labour market. Employers will use this monopsony power to pay workers less than their marginal product. This gap between marginal product and wage offers policy an opportunity to raise the wage of workers without necessarily jeopardizing their employment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Albrecht, J., and B. Axell. 1984. An equilibrium model of search unemployment. Journal of Political Economy 92: 824–840.
Bhaskar, V., and T. To. 1999. Minimum wages for Ronald McDonald monopsonies: A theory of monopsonistic competition. Economic Journal 109: 190–203.
Blanchflower, D., A. Oswald, and P. Sanfey. 1996. Wages, profits, and rent-sharing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 227–251.
Boal, W., and M. Ransom. 1997. Monopsony in the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 86–112.
Brown, C., and J. Medoff. 1989. The employer size–wage effect. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1027–1059.
Burdett, K., and D. Mortensen. 1998. Wage differentials, employer size, and unemployment. International Economic Review 39: 257–273.
Card, D., and A. Krueger. 1995. Myth and measurement: The new economics of the minimum wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clotfelter, C., E. Glennie, H. Ladd, and J. Vigdor. 2006. Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina. Working paper no. 12285. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Dickens, R., S. Machin, and A. Manning. 1999. The effects of minimum wages on employment: Theory and evidence from Britain. Journal of Labor Economics 17: 1–22.
Falch, T. 2001. Estimating the elasticity of labor supply utilizing a quasi–natural experiment. Working paper, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
Groshen, E. 1991. Sources of intra-industry wage dispersion: How much do employers matter? Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 869–884.
Just, R., and W. Chern. 1980. Tomatoes, technology, and oligopsony. Bell Journal of Economics 11: 584–602.
Kaufman, B. 1988. How labor markets work. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Kletzer, L. 1998. Job displacement. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(1): 115–136.
Manning, A. 1996. The equal pay act as an experiment to test theories of the labour market. Economica 63: 191–212.
Manning, A. 2003a. Monopsony in motion: Imperfect competition in labor markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Manning, A. 2003b. The real thin theory: Monopsony in modern labour markets. Labour Economics 10(2): 105–131.
Manning, A. 2006. A generalised model of monopsony. Economic Journal 116: 84–100.
Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: NBER.
Murray, B. 1995. Measuring oligopsony power with shadow prices: U.S. markets for pulpwood and sawlogs. Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 486–498.
Ransom, M., and R. Oaxaca. 2005. Sex differences in pay in a ‘new monopsony’ model of the labor market. Discussion paper no. 1870. Bonn: IZA.
Robinson, J. 1933. The economics of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan.
Salop, S. 1979. A model of the natural rate of unemployment. American Economic Review 69: 117–125.
Schroeter, J. 1988. Estimating the degree of market power in the beef packing industry. Review of Economics and Statistics 70: 158–162.
Smith, A. 1776. The wealth of nations. London: Penguin, 1986.
Staiger, D., J. Spetz, and C. Phibbs. 1999. Is there monopsony in the labor market? Evidence from a natural experiment. Working paper no. 7258. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Stevens, M. 2004. Wage-tenure contracts in a frictional labour market: Strategies for recruitment and retention. Review of Economic Studies 71: 535–551.
Thornton, R. 2004. Retrospectives: How Joan Robinson and B. L. Hallward named monopsony. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(2): 257–261.
Topel, R., and M. Ward. 1992. Job mobility and the careers of young men. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 439–479.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Manning, A. (2018). Monopsony. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2282
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2282
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences