The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Marginal Revolution

  • Roger E. Backhouse
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2237

Abstract

The marginal revolution saw the introduction of the idea of marginal utility into economics in the early 1870s by Jevons, Walras and Menger. This change in economic theory was a slower process than the word ‘revolution’ suggests, and, to understand the changes associated with it, it is necessary to explore the scientific, social and political context in which they occurred.

Keywords

Clark, J. B. Classical economics Cliffe Leslie, T. E. Collectivism Cournot, A. A. Energetics Eugenics Evolution Evolutionary psychology Fabian economics Green, T. H. Income distribution Individualism Ingram, J. K. Jevons, W. S. Marginal revolution Marginal utility Marshall, A. Marxism Mathematics and economics Menger, C. Mill, J. S. Mirowski, P. Poverty Rau, K. H. Say, J.-B. Schumpeter, J. A. Simultaneous equations Social Darwinism Socialism Statistics and economics Steuart, J. Subjective theory of value Supply and demand theory of value Utilitarianism Walras, L. Wicksell, J. G. K. 

JEL Classifications

B1 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Black, R.D.C. 1945. Trinity College Dublin and the theory of value. Economica 47: 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaug, M. 1996. Economic theory in retrospect, 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. De Marchi, N. (ed.) 1993. Non-natural social science: Reflecting on the enterprise of more heat than light. Durham: Duke University Press. Also in History of Political Economy 25(Suppl): 271–282.Google Scholar
  4. Hutchison, T.W. 1953. A review of economic doctrines, 1870–1929. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hutchison, T.W. 1978. On revolutions and progress in economic knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jaffe, W. 1975. Menger, Jevons and Walras dehomogenized. Economic Inquiry 14: 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maas, H.B.J.B. 2005. William Stanley Jevons and the making of modern economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mirowski, P. 1984. Physics and the marginalist revolution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 8: 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mirowski, P. 1989. More heat than light: Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Brien, D.P. 1990. Marshall’s work in relation to classical economics. In Centenary essays on Alfred Marshall, ed. J. Whitaker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Peart, S., and D. Levy. 2005. The vanity of the philosopher: From equality to hierarchy in post-classical economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Raffaelli, T. 2003. Marshall’s evolutionary economics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richter, M. 1964. The politics of conscience: T.H. Green and his age. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  14. Schabas, M. 2005. The natural origins of economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stedman Jones, G. 1984. Outcast London: A study in the relationship between classes in Victorian society, 2nd ed. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  16. Streissler, E.W. 1990. The influence of German economics on the work of Menger and Marshall. History of Political Economy 22(Annual Supplement): 31–68.Google Scholar
  17. Whitaker, J.K. (ed.). 1975. The early economic writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger E. Backhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.