Skip to main content

Property Law, Economics and

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

This entry shows how the economics of property rights can be used to understand fundamental features of property law and related extra-legal institutions. It examines both the rationale for legal doctrine and the effects of legal doctrine regarding the exercise, enforcement, and transfer of rights. It also examines various property rights regimes including open access, private ownership, common property, and state property. Property law is understood as a system of societal rules designed to create incentives for people to maintain and invest in assets, which in turn leads to specialization and trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. 1999. Transaction costs. In Encyclopedia of law and economics, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. DeGeest, Vol. I. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. 1992. Approximate optimality of aboriginal property rights. Journal of Law and Economics 35: 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1968. The optimal timing of innovations. Review of Economics and Statistics 50: 348–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1982. Measurement cost and the organization of markets. Journal of Law and Economics 25: 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1994. The capture of wealth by monopolists and the protection of property rights. International Review of Law and Economics 14: 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1997. Economic analysis of property rights. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. 1998. Investment incentives and property rights. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, Vol. 2, ed. P. Newman. New York: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., D. Rubinfeld, and P. Shapiro. 1984. The taking of land: When should compensation be paid? Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H., and R.T. Deacon. 2000. Ownership risk, investment, and the use of natural resources. American Economic Review 90: 526–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R., M. Murray, S. Salant, and J. Weise. 1999. When is the standard analysis of common property extraction under free access correct? Journal of Political Economy 107: 843–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J., and Y.J. Yoon. 2000. Symmetric tragedies: Commons and anticommons. Journal of Law and Economics 43: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G., and A. Melamed. 1972. Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85: 1089–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. 1970. The structure of a contract and the theory of a nonexclusive resource. Journal of Law and Economics 13: 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. 1985. Unity in tort, contract, and property: The model of precaution. California Law Review 73: 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57: 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharmapala, D., and R. Pitchford. 2002. An economic analysis of ‘riding to hounds’: Pierson v. Post revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 18: 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dnes, A., and D. Lueck. 2006. An economic analysis of servitudes on land. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J., and P. Menell. 1998. Property law and policy: A comparative institutional perspective. Westbury: The Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. 1973. Alternatives to zoning: Covenants, nuisance rules, and fines as land use controls. University of Chicago Law Review 40: 681–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. 1991. Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. 1993. Property in land. Yale Law Journal 102: 1315–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. 1979. Possession as the root of title. Georgia Law Review 85: 1221–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. 1985. Why restrain alienation? Columbia Law Review 85: 970–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. 1986. Past and future: The temporal dimension in the law of property. Washington University Law Quarterly 64: 667–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W., and P. Shapiro. 1988. Takings, insurance, and Michelman: Comments on economic interpretations of ‘just compensation’ law. Journal of Legal Studies 17: 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., R. Gilbert, J. Sitglitz, and J. Tirole. 1983. Preemption, leapfrogging, and competition in patent races. European Economic Review 22: 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. 1954. The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery. Journal of Political Economy 62: 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, K., and S. Gray. 2000. Elements of land law. 3rd ed. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. 1991. Condominium and cooperative housing: Transactional efficiency, tax subsidies, and tenure choice. Journal of Legal Studies 20: 25–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C., and J. Vickers. 1985. Perfect equilibrium in a model of a race. Review of Economic Studies 52: 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. 1998. The tragedy of the anti-commons: Property in transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review 111: 621–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L., and S. Shavell. 1996. Property rules versus liability rules. Harvard Law Review 109: 713–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, G. 1989. Contracting for property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, D. 1989. The economic nature of wildlife law. Journal of Legal Studies 18: 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, D. 1994. Common property as an egalitarian share contract. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25: 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, D. 1995. The rule of first possession and the design of the law. Journal of Law and Economics 38: 393–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, D. 1998. Wildlife law. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, ed. P. Newman, Vol. 3. New York: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, D., and T. Miceli. 2007. Property rights and property law. In Handbook of law and economics, ed. A. Polinsky and S. Shavell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, T. 1998. Trespass and nuisance. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, ed. P. Newman, Vol. 3. New York: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, T., and H. Smith. 2000. Optimal standardization in the law of property: The numerus clausus principle. Yale Law Journal 110: 1–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, T. 1997. Economics of the law: Torts, contracts, property, litigation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, T., and K. Segerson. 1994. Regulatory takings: When should compensation be paid? Journal of Legal Studies 23: 749–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, T., and K. Segerson. 1996. Compensation for regulatory takings: An economic analysis with applications. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, D. 1982. Property rights and efficiency in mating, racing, and related games. American Economic Review 72: 968–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch, P. 1976. An economic analysis of eminent domain. Journal of Political Economy 84: 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky, A. 1980. On the choice between property rules and liability rules. Economic Inquiry 18: 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. 2003. Economic analysis of law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen Law and Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. 1985. Possession as the origin of property. University of Chicago Law Review 53: 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. 1986. The comedy of the commons, custom, commerce, and inherently public property. University of Chicago Law Review 53: 711–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. 1998. Evolution of property rights. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, ed. P. Newman, Vol. 2. New York: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. 1985. Inalienability and the theory of property rights. Columbia Law Review 85: 931–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. 1998. Inalienability. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, ed. P. Newman, Vol. 2. New York: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1980. Strict liability versus negligence. Journal of Legal Studies 9: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 2004. Foundations of economic analysis of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. 2000. Semicommon property rights and scattering in the open fields. Journal of Legal Studies 29: 131–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. 1999. Decomposition of property rights. In Encyclopedia of law and economics, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. DeGeest, Vol. 2. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. 1975. Fiscal zoning in fragmented metropolitan areas. In Fiscal zoning and land use controls, ed. E. Mills and W. Oates. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lueck, D. (2018). Property Law, Economics and. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2225

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics