Skip to main content

Equality of Opportunity

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Whereas the ethic of equality of outcome does not hold individuals responsible for actions that may create inequality of outcomes, equality of opportunity ‘levels the playing field’ so that all have potential to achieve equal outcomes; inequalities of outcome that then transpire are not compensable at the bar of justice. The influences on the outcome a person experiences comprise circumstances (for which he should not be held responsible) and effort (for which he should be). Equal-opportunity policy compensates persons for their disadvantaged circumstances, ensuring that, finally, only effort counts in achieving outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arneson, R. 1989. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, J., and J. Roemer. 2003. Equalizing opportunity through reform. In Schools and the equal opportunity problem, ed. P. Peterson and L. Woessmann. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calsamiglia, C. 2005. Decentralizing equality of opportunity and issues concerning the equality of educational opportunity. Ph.D. dissertation. New Haven: Department of Economics, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99: 906–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1981a. What is equality? Part one: Equality of welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 185–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1981b. What is equality? Part two: Equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 283–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M., and F. Maniquet. 2004. Compensation and responsibility. In Handbook of social choice and welfare, ed. K. Arrow, A. Sen, and K. Suzumura, vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. 1993. A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philosophy & Public Affairs 22: 146–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. 1996. Theories of distributive justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. 1998. Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J., R. Aaberge, U. Colombino, J. Fritzell, S. Jenkins, I. Marx, M. Page, E. Pommer, J. Ruiz-Castillo, M.J. San Segundo, T. Tranaes, G. Wagner, and I. Zubiri. 2003. To what extent do fiscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens? Journal of Public Economics 87: 539–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1979. Utilitarianism and welfarism. Journal of Philosophy 76: 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, D. 1993. Equality of opportunity and investment in human capital. Ph.D. dissertation. Leuven: Catholic University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Roemer, J.E. (2018). Equality of Opportunity. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2223

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics