The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Feminist Economics

  • Julie A. Nelson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2210

Abstract

Feminist economics is a field that includes both studies of gender roles in the economy from a liberatory perspective and critical work directed at biases in the economics discipline. It challenges economic analyses that treat women as invisible, or that serve to reinforce situations oppressive to women, and develops innovative research designed to overcome these failings. Feminist economics points out how subjective biases concerning acceptable topics and methods have compromised the reliability of economics research. Topics addressed include the economics of households, labour markets, care, development, the macroeconomy, national budgets, and the history, philosophy, methodology, and teaching of economics.

Keywords

Sen, A American Economic Association Bargaining models Caring work Children Data quality Development Divorce Ecology Economic man Equal rights movement Feminist economics Fertility Gender Gender equity Gender roles Health care Household production Household labour Institutional economics International Association for Feminist Economics Innate differences Intrahousehold distribution Labour market discrimination Marriage Masculinist bias Methodology of economics Occupational segregation Opportunity cost method Post Keynesian economics Postmodernism Race Radical economics Replacement cost method Social economics Structural adjustment Subcontracting Trade liberalization Unpaid work Women’s economic status 

JEL Classifications

B31 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Aerni, A., and K. McGoldrick (eds.). 1999. Valuing us all: Towards feminist pedagogy in economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B. 1997. ‘Bargaining’ and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics 3(1): 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal, B., J. Humphries, and I. Robeyns. 2003. A special issue on Amartya Sen’s work and ideas. Feminist Economics 9(2/3).Google Scholar
  4. Albelda, R., S. Himmelweit, and J. Humphries. 2004. A special issue on lone mothers. Feminist Economics 10(2).Google Scholar
  5. Aslanbeigui, N., S. Pressman, and G. Summerfield (eds.). 1994. Women in the age of economic transformation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Badgett, L. 2001. Money, myths and change: The economic lives of lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Balakrishnan, R. (ed.). 2002. The hidden assembly line: Gender dynamics of subcontracted work in a global economy. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barker, D., and E. Kuiper (eds.). 2003. Toward a feminist philosophy of economics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Benería, L. 2003. Gender, development, and globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bergmann, B. 1974. Occupational segregation, wages and profits when employers discriminate by race or sex. Eastern Economic Journal 1(2/3): 103–110.Google Scholar
  11. Bergmann, B. 1989. Does the market for women’s labor need fixing? Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(1): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bettio, F., and J. Plantenga. 2004. Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics 10(1): 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Booth, A., J. Burton, and K. Mumford. 2000. The position of women in UK academic economics. Economic Journal 110: 312–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer, R., C. Conrad, and M. King, eds. 2002. A special issue on gender, color, caste and class. Feminist Economics 8(2).Google Scholar
  15. Budlender, D., D. Elson, G. Hewitt, and T. Mukhopadhyay. 2002. Gender budgets make cents. London: Commonwealth Secretariat Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Çagatay, N., D. Elson, and C. Grown, eds. 1995. Special issue on gender, adjustment and macroeconomics. World Development 23(11).Google Scholar
  17. Danby, C. 2004. Toward a gendered Post Keynesianism. Feminist Economics 10(3): 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dimand, M.A., R.W. Dimand, and E.L. Forget (eds.). 1995. Women of value: Feminist essays on the history of women in economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Elson, D. (ed.). 1991. Male bias in the development process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Emami, Z. 1993. Challenges facing social economics in the twenty-first century: A feminist perspective. Review of Social Economy 52: 416–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feiner, S. 2004. There are none so blind…. In A guide to what’s wrong with economics, ed. E. Fullbrook. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ferber, M., and B. Birnbaum. 1977. The ‘new home economics’: Retrospects and prospects. Journal of Consumer Research 4: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferber, M., and J. Nelson (eds.). 1993. Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ferber, M., and J. Nelson (eds.). 2003. Feminist economics today: Beyond economic man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Figart, D., E. Mutari, and M. Power. 2002. Living wages, equal wages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Folbre, N. 1991. The unproductive housewife: Her evolution in nineteenth-century economic thought. Signs 16: 463–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Folbre, N. 1994. Who pays for the kids? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Folbre, N., and J. Nelson. 2000. For love or money – Or both? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ginther, D., and S. Kahn. 2004. Women in economics: Moving up or falling off the academic career ladder? Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(3): 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grown, C., D. Elson, and N. Çagatay, eds. 2000. Special issue on growth, trade, finance and gender inequality. World Development 28(7).Google Scholar
  31. Hartmann, H. 1976. Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex. Signs 1(3, part 2): 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Himmelweit, S. 1999. Caring labor. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Humphries, J. 1990. Enclosures, common rights, and women. Journal of Economic History 50: 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ironmonger, D. 1996. Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labor. Feminist Economics 2(3): 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kabeer, N. 2000. The power to choose: Bangladeshi women and labour market conditions in London and Dhaka. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Kuiper, E., and J. Sap (eds.). 1995. Out of the margin: Feminist perspectives on economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. MacDonald, M. 1998. Gender and social security policy. Feminist Economics 4(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matthaei, J. 1996. Why feminist, marxist and anti-racist economists should be feminist-marxist-anti-racist economists. Feminist Economics 2(1): 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McElroy, M., and M. Horney. 1981. Nash bargained household decisions. International Economic Review 22: 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nelson, J. 1995. Feminism and economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(2): 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelson, J. 2005. Interpersonal relations and economics. In Economics and social interactions, ed. B. Gui and R. Sugden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Perkins, E., ed. 1997. Women, ecology and economics. Special issue of Ecological Economics 20(2).Google Scholar
  43. Peterson, J., and M. Lewis. 1999. The Elgar companion to feminist economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pujol, M. 1992. Feminism and anti-feminism in early economic thought. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  45. Rubery, J. (ed.). 1998. Equal pay in Europe? London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Sen, A. 1984. Resources, values, and development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ch. 16.Google Scholar
  47. Sen, A. 1990. More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books, 20 December.Google Scholar
  48. Shackelford, J. 1992. Feminist pedagogy. American Economic Review 82: 570–576.Google Scholar
  49. Strassmann, D. 1995. Editorial: Creating a forum for feminist inquiry. Feminist Economics 1(1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagman, B., and N. Folbre. 1996. Household services and economic growth in the United States, 1870–1930. Feminist Economics 2: 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Waller, W., and A. Jennings. 1990. On the possibility of a feminist economics. Journal of Economic Issues 24: 613–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waring, M. 1988. If women counted. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  53. Wheelock, J., E. Oughton, and S. Baines. 2003. Getting by with a little help from your family: Toward a policy-relevant model of the household. Feminist Economics 9(1): 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie A. Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.