Skip to main content

Affirmative Action

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Affirmative action practices go beyond non-discrimination to enhance employment, education, and business-ownership opportunities for minorities and women. Critics argue that affirmative action does this at the expense of white males who might be more qualified, and so could be both unfair and inefficient. Supporters claim that affirmative action is necessary to overcome the many inherent disadvantages faced by minorities and women, and could enhance efficiency by expanding the pool of available talent or because diversity itself has positive impacts. This article summarizes the evidence for these arguments and claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Antonio, A., et al. 2004. Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science 15: 507–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athey, S., C. Avery, and P. Zemsky. 2000. Mentoring and diversity. American Economic Review 90: 765–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attiyeh, G., and R. Attiyeh. 1997. Testing for bias in graduate school admissions. Journal of Human Resources 32: 524–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, L. 1995. Affirmative action in a changing legal and economic environment. Industrial Relations 34: 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., and D. Williams. 1995. Preferential procurement programs and minority- owned businesses. Journal of Urban Affairs 17: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W., and D. Bok. 1998. The shape of the river. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D., and A. Sapp. 1991. Police education and minority recruitment: The impact of a college requirement. Washington, DC: Police Executives Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S., and G. Loury. 1993. Will affirmative action policies eliminate negative stereotypes? American Economic Review 83: 1220–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datcher Loury, L., and K. Garman. 1995. College selectivity and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics 13: 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., and E. Lewis. 1997. Affirmative action and other special considerations admissions at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 1153–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, W., and T. Kane. 1999. Racial test score differences as evidence of reverse discrimination: Less than meets the eye. Industrial Relations 28: 331–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H., and D. Neumark. 1999. Are affirmative action hires less qualified? Journal of Labor Economics 17: 534–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H., and D. Neumark. 2000a. Assessing affirmative action. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 483–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H., and D. Neumark. 2000b. What does affirmative action do? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53: 240–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. 1998. Racial preferences and higher education. In The black-white test score gap, ed. C. Jencks and M. Phillips. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolpin, V., and L. Singell. 1996. The gender composition and scholarly performance of economics departments: A test for employment discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 49: 408–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. 1990. The impact of affirmative action regulation and equal opportunity law on employment. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. 2004. Race and college admissions: An alternative to affirmative action? Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 1020–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D., and R. Gardecki. 1998. Women helping women? Role model and mentoring effects on female Ph.D. students in economics. Journal of Human Resources 33: 220–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander, R. 2004. A systematic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Stanford Law Review 57: 368–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephanopoulos, G., and C. Edley. 1995. Review of federal affirmative action programs. Unpublished White House document. http://clinton4.nara.gov/textonly/WH/EOP/OP/html/aa/aa-lett.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Holzer, H.J., Neumark, D. (2018). Affirmative Action. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2202

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics