Skip to main content

Superneutrality

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Money is said to be superneutral – or long-run neutral – if changes in the steady-state rate of growth of the money supply do not affect the value of real economic variables. Superneutrality depends on the hypothesis that the marginal productivity of capital is not affected by the level or the growth rate of money balances. It may hold true in steady state equilibria where the marginal utility of consumption is constant over time. Qualitatively, superneutrality is a fragile, knife-edged result that fails in a variety of contexts. Empirically, however, it is not clear that deviations from superneutrality are quantitatively significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, G.A., W.T. Dickens, and G.L. Perry. 1996. The macroeconomics of low inflation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1996(1): 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. 1996. Inflation and growth. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 78(3): 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, J., and J. Keating. 1995. Superneutrality in postwar economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 36: 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, T.F., and G.D. Hansen. 1989. The inflation tax in a real business cycle model. American Economic Review 79: 733–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danthine, J.-P., J. Donaldson, and L. Smith. 1987. On the superneutrality of money in a stochastic dynamic macroeconomic model. Journal of Monetary Economics 20: 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. 1979. Capital accumulation on the transition path in a monetary optimizing model. Econometrica 47: 1433–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfriend, M., and R.G. King. 1997. The new neoclassical synthesis and the role of monetary policy. In NBER macroeconomics annual, ed. B.S. Bernanke and J.J. Rotemberg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R.G., and M.W. Watson. 1994. The post-war U.S. Phillips curve: A revisionist econometric history. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 41: 157–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCandless, G.T. Jr., and W.E. Weber. 1995. Some monetary facts. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 19(3): 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. 1967. Phillips curves, expectations of inflation and optimal unemployment over time. Economica 34: 254–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidrauski, M. 1967. Rational choice and patterns of growth in a monetary economy. American Economic Review, Proceedings 57: 534–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. 1965. Money and economic growth. Econometrica 33: 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. 1980. The effect of money supply on economic welfare in the steady state. Econometrica 48: 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Danthine, JP. (2018). Superneutrality. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2194

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics