The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Thin Markets

  • Marzena Rostek
  • Marek Weretka
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2174

Abstract

A thin market is a market with few buying or selling offers. The concept of market thinness, while general, is typically used in the context of financial markets. When the number of buying or selling offers is small, investors’ trading positions are large relative to market size. Trading then requires price concessions and thus exerts an impact on prices. A thin market is characterized by low trading volume, high volatility and high bid–ask spreads. This article discusses the modelling of thin markets, some typical phenomena of such markets, and their implications for market design.

Keywords

Asset pricing Blockage discount Inventory models Liquidity Market efficiency Market power Market structure Oligopoly Overshooting Predatory trading Thin markets 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Almgren, R. 2003. Optimal execution with non-linear impact functions and trading enhanced risk. Applied Mathematical Finance 10: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almgren, R., and N. Chriss. 2000. Optimal execution of portfolio transactions. Journal of Risk 3: 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almgren, R., C. Thum, E. Hauptmann, and H. Li. 2005. Equity market impact. Risk 18: 57–62.Google Scholar
  4. Attari, M., A. Mello, and M. Ruckes. 2005. Arbitraging arbitrageurs. Journal of Finance 60(5): 2471–2511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Back, K. 1992. Insider trading in continuous time. Review of Financial Studies 5(3): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertsimas, D., and A. Lo. 1998. Optimal control of execution costs. Journal of Financial Markets 1: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunnermeier, M., and L. Pedersen. 2005. Predatory trading. Journal of Finance 4: 1825–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvajal, A., and M. Weretka. 2007. State prices and arbitrage in thin financial markets. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, L., and J. Lakonishok. 1993. Institutional traders and intraday stock price behavior. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, L., and J. Lakonishok. 1995. The behavior of stock price around institutional trades. Journal of Finance 50: 1147–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeMarzo, P.M., and B. Urošević. 2006. Ownership dynamics and asset pricing with a large shareholder. Journal of Political Economy 4: 145–174.Google Scholar
  12. Dubil, R. 2002. Optimal liquidation of venture capital stakes. Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures 7(2): 56–81.Google Scholar
  13. Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. 1987. Price, trade size, and information in securities markets. Journal of Financial Economics 19: 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engle, R., and R. Ferstenberg. 2007. Execution risk. Journal of Portfolio Management 33: 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, F.D., and S. Viswanathan. 1996. Strategic trading when agents forecast the forecasts of others. Journal of Finance 51(4): 1437–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glosten, L., and P. Milgrom. 1985. Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossman, S.J., and M.H. Miller. 1988. Liquidity and market structure. Journal of Finance 43(3): 617–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ho, T., and H.R. Stoll. 1981. Optimal dealer pricing under transactions and return uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics 9: 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holden, C.W., and A. Subrahmanyam. 1996. Risk aversion, liquidity, and endogenous short horizons. Review of Financial Studies 9(2): 691–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huberman, G., and W. Stanzl. 2004. Price manipulation and quasi-arbitrage. Econometrica 74(4): 1247–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keim, D., and A. Madhavan. 1995. The anatomy of the trading process: Empirical evidence on the behavior of institutional traders. Journal of Financial Economics 37: 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keim, D., and A. Madhavan. 1996. The upstairs markets for large-block transactions: Analyses and measurement of price effects. Review of Financial Studies 9: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keim, D., and A. Madhavan. 1998. Execution costs and investment performance: An empirical analysis of institutional equity trades, Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Paper, 09-95.Google Scholar
  24. Kyle, A.S. 1985. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53: 1315–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kyle, A.S. 1989. Informed speculation and imperfect competition. Review of Economic Studies 56: 517–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell, M., L.H. Pedersen, and T. Pulvino. 2007. Slow moving capital. American Economic Review, P&P 97(2): 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perold, A. 1988. The implementation shortfall: Paper versus reality. Journal of Portfolio Management 14: 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pritsker, M. 2005. Large investors: Implications for equilibrium asset, returns, shock absorption, and liquidity, Finance and Economic Discussion Series 2005-36, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
  29. Rostek, M., and M. Weretka. 2007. Frequent trading and price impact in thin markets. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  30. Rostek, M., and M. Weretka. 2008. Small double auctions. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  31. Subramanian, A., and R. Jarrow. 2001. The liquidity discount. Mathematical Finance 11: 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Urosevic, B. 2005. Moral hazard and dynamics of insider ownership stakes. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Economics Working Papers, 787.Google Scholar
  33. Vayanos, D. 1999. Strategic trading and welfare in a dynamic market. Review of Economic Studies 66: 219–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vayanos, D. 2001. Strategic trading in a dynamic noisy market. Journal of Finance 56(1): 131–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weretka, M. 2006. Endogenous market power. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marzena Rostek
    • 1
  • Marek Weretka
    • 1
  1. 1.