The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Countertrade

  • Dalia Marin
  • Monika Schnitzer
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_217

Abstract

International countertrade – tying an import to an export – emerged in the 1980s in response to the international debt crisis. Barter – the exchange of goods without using money – re-emerged in transition economies in the 1990s, in response to a domestic debt crisis. Both phenomena can be explained as institutional responses to contractual problems arising in imperfect capital and goods markets. Countertrade introduces a deal-specific collateral that improves the creditworthiness of countries and firms, and facilitates technology transfer to developing countries. Barter helps to overcome the lack of trust problem in the former Soviet Union.

Keywords

Asymmetric information Barter Buyback Collateral, deal-specific Commitment Contract enforcement Counterpurchase Countertrade Creditworthiness Credit constraint Cross-subsidy Foreign direct investment Foreign exchange shortage Incentive contracts International debt crisis Liquidity constraints North–South economic relations Planning Price discrimination Reputation Social networks Social norms Soft budget constraint Transfer of technology Trust, lack of Virtual economy 

JEL Classifications

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Banks, G. 1983. The economics and politics of countertrade. World Economy 6: 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caves, R. 1974. The economics of reciprocity: Theory and evidence on bilateral trading arrangements. In International trade and finance: Essays in honour of Jan Tinbergen, ed. W. Sellekaerts. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Caves, R., and D. Marin. 1992. Countertrade transactions: Theory and evidence. Economic Journal 102: 1171–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan, R., and M. Hoy. 1991. East–West joint ventures and buyback contracts. Journal of International Economics 30: 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellingson, T., and L.A. Stole. 1996. Mandated countertrade as a strategic commitment. Journal of International Economics 40: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaddy, C.G., and B.W. Ickes. 1998. Russia’s virtual economy. Foreign Affairs 77: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hennart, J.-F. 1989. The transaction-cost rationale for countertrade. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 5: 127–153.Google Scholar
  8. Kogut, B. 1986. On designing contracts to enforce contractibility: Theory and evidence from East-West trade. Journal of International Business Studies 17: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marin, D. 2002. Trust versus illusion: What is driving demonetization in Russia? Economics of Transition 10: 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marin, D., and M. Schnitzer. 1995. Tying trade flows: A theory of countertrade with evidence. American Economic Review 85: 1047–1064.Google Scholar
  11. Marin, D., and M. Schnitzer. 2002a. Contracts in trade and transition: The resurgence of barter. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Marin, D., and M. Schnitzer. 2002b. The economic institution of international barter. Economic Journal 112: 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marin, D., and M. Schnitzer. 2005. Disorganization and financial collapse. European Economic Review 47: 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miras, R., and B. Yeung. 1987. Countertrade and foreign exchange shortages: A preliminary assessment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 123: 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miras, R., and B. Yeung. 1993. Why countertrade? An economic perspective. International Trade Journal 7: 409–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1981. East–West trade: Recent developments in countertrade. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  17. OECD. 1985. Countertrade: Developing countries practices. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. Parsons, J.E. 1987. Forms of GDR economic cooperation with the nonsocialist countries. Comparative Economic Studies 29: 7–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dalia Marin
    • 1
  • Monika Schnitzer
    • 1
  1. 1.