The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Efficiency Wages

  • Andrew Weiss
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2144

Abstract

Efficiency wages capture the effect of compensation on the behaviour of workers, as well as on the quality of workers attracted and retained by the firm. This effect has greater significance in some areas than others, and can be used to explain wage differentials among firms and industries, as well as to explain why firms respond to demand shocks by reducing their labour force rather than cutting wages, and may ration jobs even in normal times. At the macroeconomic level efficiency wages can explain persistent long-term unemployment as an equilibrium outcome in a competitive labour market.

Keywords

Capital cost Capital market imperfections Efficiency wages Firm size Firm-specific human capital Gift exchange Involuntary unemployment Labour supply Layoffs Low-wage probation period Monitoring Nutrition models Productivity Retirement Sorting effect of wages Wage differentials 

JEL Classifications

J310 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Akerlof, G.A. 1982. Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 543–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G.A. 1984. Gift exchange and efficiency-wage theory: Four views. American Economic Review 74(2): 79–83.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, C., and J. Medoff. 1989. The employer size-wage effect. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1027–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Futia, C. 1977. Excess supply equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibbons, R., and L. Katz. 1992. Does unmeasured ability explain inter-industry wage differentials? Review of Economic Studies 59: 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Groshen, E., and E.S. Loh. 1993. What do we know about probationary periods? In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison.Google Scholar
  7. Klein, R., R. Spady, and A. Weiss. 1991. Factors affecting the output and quit propensities of production workers. Review of Economic Studies 58: 929–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Landau, H., and A. Weiss. 1984. Wages, hiring standards and firm size. Journal of Labor Economics 2: 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lang, K. 1991. Persistent wage dispersion and involuntary unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lazear, E., and S. Rosen. 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy 89: 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Salop, J., and S. Salop. 1976. Self-selection and turnover in the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90: 619–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Salop, S. 1979. A model of the natural rate of unemployment. American Economic Review 69: 117–125.Google Scholar
  13. Shapiro, C., and J. Stiglitz. 1984. Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review 74: 433–444.Google Scholar
  14. Solow, R. 1979. Another possible source of wage stickiness. Journal of Macroeconomics 1: 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weiss, A. 1981. Job queues and layoffs in labor markets with flexible wages. Journal of Political Economy 88: 526–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weiss, A. 1984. Determinants of quit behavior. Journal of Labor Economics 2: 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weiss, A. 1985. Absenteeism and wages. Economics Letters 19: 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weiss, A., and R. Wang. 1998. Probation, layoffs, and wage-tenure profiles: A sorting explanation. Labour Economics 5: 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Weiss
    • 1
  1. 1.