Abstract
There have been a number of changes in monetary policy rules in the United States and UK since the early 1960s. The Lucas critique says that this should induce changes in the equilibrium law of motion. This article summarizes reduced-form evidence on the evolving law of motion for inflation in the USA and the UK. Since the 1970s, inflation has become lower on average, less volatile and less persistent. There is also less uncertainty about the central bank’s long-run target for inflation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Benati, L., and H. Mumtaz. 2006. The great stability in the UK: God policy or good luck? Bank of England: Working paper.
Beveridge, S., and C. Nelson. 1981. A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 7: 151–174.
Canova, F., and L. Gambetti. 2006. Structural changes in the U.S. economy: Bad luck or bad policy? Discussion Paper No. 5457. London: CEPR.
Clarida, R., J. Gali, and M. Gertler. 2000. Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 147–180.
Cochrane, J. 1988. How big is the random walk in GNP? Journal of Political Economy 96: 893–920.
Cogley, T., and T. Sargent. 2001. Evolving post-World War II U.S. inflation dynamics. In NBER macroeconomics annual 16, ed. B. Bernanke and K. Rogo. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cogley, T., and T. Sargent. 2005a. Drifts and volatilities: Monetary policies and outcomes in the post World War II U.S. Review of Economic Dynamics 8: 262–302.
Cogley, T., and T. Sargent. 2005b. The conquest of U.S. inflation: Learning and robustness to model uncertainty. Review of Economic Dynamics 8: 528–563.
Cogley, T., S. Morozov, and T. Sargent. 2005. Bayesian fan charts for U.K. inflation: Forecasting and sources of uncertainty in an evolving monetary system. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29: 1893–1925.
Lubik, T., and F. Shorfheide. 2004. Testing for indeterminacy: An application to U.S. monetary policy. American Economic Review 94: 190–217.
McConnell, M., and G. Perez Quiros. 2000. Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980s? American Economic Review 90: 1464–1476.
Okun, A. 1978. Discussion. In Curing chronic inflation, ed. A. Okun and G. Perry. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Orphanides, A. 2001. Monetary policy rules based on real-time data. American Economic Review 91: 964–985.
Orphanides, A. 2003. The quest for prosperity without inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics 50: 633–663.
Primiceri, G. 2005a. Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy. Review of Economic Studies 72: 821–852.
Primiceri, G. 2005b. Why inflation rose and fell: Policymakers’ beliefs and U.S. postwar stabilization policy. Working Paper No. 11147. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Stock, J., and M. Watson. 2005. Has inflation become harder to forecast? Mimeo: Harvard University and Princeton University.
Taylor, J. 1993. Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39: 195–214.
Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cogley, T. (2018). Inflation Dynamics. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2087
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2087
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences