The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Equivalence Scales

  • Arthur Lewbel
  • Krishna Pendakur
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2056

Abstract

An equivalence scale is a measure of the cost of living of a household of a given size and demographic composition, relative to the cost of living of a reference household (usually a single adult), when both households attain the same level of utility or standard of living. Equivalence scales are difficult to construct because household utility cannot be directly measured, which results in economic identification problems. Applications of equivalence scales include measurement of social welfare, economic inequality, poverty, and costs of children; indexing payments for social benefits, life insurance, alimony, and legal compensation for wrongful death.

Keywords

Consumer expenditure Engel scales Equivalence scales Happiness, economics of Interpersonal utility comparisons Marshallian demand functions Neuroeconomics Poverty lines Revealed preference theory Rothbard scales Shephard’s Lemma Wellbeing 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Barten, A.P. 1964. Family composition, prices, and expenditure patterns. In Econometric analysis for national planning: 16th symposium of the colston society, ed. P. Hart, L. Mills, and J.K. Whitaker. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  2. Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson. 1993. Adult-equivalence scales and the economic implementation of interpersonal comparisons of well-being. Social Choice and Welfare 10: 335–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blundell, R.W., and A. Lewbel. 1991. The information content of equivalence scales. Journal of Econometrics 50: 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browning, M., P.-A, Chiappori., and A. Lewbel. 2006. Estimating consumption economies of scale, adult equivalence scales, and household bargaining power, Working Paper No. 588. Boston: Boston College.Google Scholar
  5. Donaldson, D., and K. Pendakur. 2004. Equivalent-expenditure functions and expenditure-dependent equivalence scales. Journal of Public Economics 88: 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donaldson, D., and K. Pendakur. 2006. The identification of fixed costs from consumer behaviour. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 24: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engel, E. 1895. Die Lebenskosten Belgischer Arbeiter-Familien Fruher and jetzt. International Statistical Institute Bulletin 9: 1–74.Google Scholar
  8. Fisher, G.M. 1997. The development and history of the U.S. poverty thresholds – A brief overview. Washington, DC: Newsletter of the Government Statistics Section and the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  9. Gorman, W.M. 1976. Tricks with utility functions. In Essays in economic analysis: Proceedings of the 1975 AUTE conference, ed. M. Sheffield, J. Artis, and A.R. Nobay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, C.A. 1968. Revised equivalence scale for estimating equivalent incomes or budget cost by family type, Bulletin 1570–2. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Jorgenson, D.W., and D.T. Slesnick. 1987. Aggregate consumer behavior and household equivalence scales. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5: 219–232.Google Scholar
  12. Kapteyn, A., and B. Van Praag. 1976. A new approach to the construction of family equivalence scales. European Economic Review 7: 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewbel, A. 1985. A unified approach to incorporating demographic or other effects into demand systems. Review of Economic Studies 52: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewbel, A. 1989. Household equivalence scales and welfare comparisons. Journal of Public Economics 39: 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewbel, A. 1997. Consumer demand systems and household equivalence scales. In Handbook of Applied Econometrics, vol. 2. Microeconomics, ed. M.H. Pesaran and P. Schmidt. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Lewbel, A. 2003. Calculating compensation in cases of wrongful death. Journal of Econometrics 113: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McFadden, D. 2005. The new science of pleasure, consumer behavior and the measurement of well-being. Frisch Lecture. London: Econometric Society World Congress.Google Scholar
  18. Pendakur, K. 1999. Estimates and tests of base-independent equivalence scales. Journal of Econometrics 88: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollak, R.A. 1989. The theory of the cost of living index. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Prais, S.J., and H.S. Houthakker. 1955. The analysis of family budgets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rothbarth, E. 1943. Note on a method of determining equivalent income for families of different composition. In War-time pattern of saving and spending, ed. C. Madge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sydenstricker, E., and W.I. King. 1921. The measurement of the relative economic status of families. Quarterly Publication of the American Statistical Association 17: 842–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Lewbel
    • 1
  • Krishna Pendakur
    • 1
  1. 1.