The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Social Networks, Economic Relevance of

  • James Moody
  • Martina Morris
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2046

Abstract

Social network analysis has a long history in sociology, but interest in this topic has broadened dramatically since 1995. This article reviews the origins and key concepts from the sociological literature on social networks, and outlines the network approach to economic behaviour (see Zuckerman J Econ Lit 46, 545–565, 2003 or White Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002 for a broader vision of ‘economic networks’ not covered here due to space limitations). The central themes we trace relate to ‘social embeddedness’ and aggregation – how occupying different positions in complex networks enables and constrains action, as well as the resulting properties of global networks that arise from these actions.

Keywords

Division of labour Durkheim, E Simmel, G Social balance theory Social networks Trust 

JEL Classifications

D85 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Baker, W. 1984. The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology 89: 775–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabasi, A.-L., and R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearman, P., J. Moody, and K. Stovel. 2004. Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic networks. American Journal of Sociology 110: 44–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P.M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, P.M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, P.M., and J.E. Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Bowles, S., J.K. Choi, and A. Hopfensitz. 2003. The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 223: 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Centola, D., R. Willer, and M. Macy. 2005. The emperor’s dilemma: A computational model of self-enforcing norms. American Journal of Sociology 110: 1009–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase, I.D. 1980. Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. American Sociological Review 45: 905–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J.M. 1977. Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education 50: 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, J.S., E. Katz, and H. Menzel. 1966. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20: 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook, K.S., R.M. Emerson, M.R. Gillmore, and T. Yamagishi. 1983. The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental evidence. American Journal of Sociology 89: 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, J.A. 1963. Structural balance, mechanical solidarity, and interpersonal relations. American Journal of Sociology 68: 444–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durkheim, E. 1984. The division of labor in society. Trans. W.D. Halls. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Feld, S.L. 1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 81: 1287–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Granovetter, M. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action, ed. N. Nohria and R.G. Eccles. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  20. Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., Butts, C.T., Goodreau, S.M., and Morris, M. 2003. Statnet: An R package for the statistical modeling of social networks. Funding support from NIH grants R01DA012831 and R01HD041877. Available at http://www.csde.washington.edu/statnet. Accessed 22 March 2007.
  21. Holland, P., and J. Leinhardt. 1971. Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies 2: 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnsen, E.C. 1985. Network macrostructure models for the Davis–Leinhardt set of empirical sociomatrices. Social Networks 7: 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnsen, E.C. 1986. Structure and process: Agreement models for friendship formation. Social Networks 8: 257–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keister, L.A. 2001. Exchange structures in transition: A longitudinal study of lending and trade relations in Chinese business groups. American Sociological Review 66: 336–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, N.H. 1969. The search for an abortionist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lin, N. 2002. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mare, R.D. 1991. Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review 56: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsden, P.V. 1987. Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 52: 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and M.E. Brashears. 2006. Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review 71: 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moody, J. 1999. The structure of adolescent social relations: Modeling friendship in dynamic social settings. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  31. Moody, J. 2000. The importance of relationship timing for diffusion. Social Forces 81: 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moody, J., and D.R. White. 2003. Social cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical conception of social groups. American Sociological Review 68: 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morris, M. 1993. Epidemiology and social networks: Modeling structured diffusion. Sociological Methods and Research 22: 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris, M. 1995. Data driven network models for the spread of infectious disease. In Epidemic models: Their structure and relation to data, ed. D. Mollison, 302–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Morris, M. 2003. Local rules and global properties: Modeling the emergence of network structure. In Dynamic social network modeling and analysis, ed. R. Breiger, K. Carley, and P. Pattison. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Morris, M. 2004. Network epidemiology: A handbook for survey design and data collection, International Studies in Demography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris, M., S. Goodreau, and J. Moody. 2008. Sexual networks, concurrency, and STD/HIV. In Sexually transmitted diseases, 4th ed, ed. K.K. Holmes, P.F. Sparling, W.E. Stamm, P. Piot, J.N. Wasserheit, L. Corey, M. Cohen, and H. Watts. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Morris, M., and M. Kretzschmar. 1997. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS 11: 641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers, D.J. 2000. The diffusion of collective violence: Infectiousness, susceptibility, and mass media networks. American Journal of Sociology 106: 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pool, I.D.S., and M. Kochen. 1978. Contacts and influence. Social Networks 1: 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Simmel, G. 1908. In The sociology of Georg Simmel, ed. K.H. Wolf. New York: The Free Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  43. Snijders, T.A.B.. 2001. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology 31: 361–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snijders, T.A.B.., P.E. Pattison, G.L. Robins, and M.S. Handcock. 2006. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology 36: 99–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review 61: 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uzzi, B. 1999. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review 64: 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valente, T.W. 1995. Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watts, D.J., and S.H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, H.C. 1963. Anatomy of kinship: Mathematical models for structures of cumulated roles. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  51. White, H.C. 2002. Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Zuckerman, E.W. 2003. On networks and markets. Journal of Economic Literature 46: 545–565.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Moody
    • 1
  • Martina Morris
    • 1
  1. 1.