Abstract
Experimental labour economics uses experimental techniques to improve our understanding of labour economics issues. We start by putting experimental data into perspective with the data-sets typically used by empirical labour economists. We then discuss several examples of how experiments can inform labour economics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Akerlof, G. 1982. Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 543–569.
Bewley, T. 1999. Why wages don’t fall in a recession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandts, J., and G. Charness. 2004. Do labour market conditions affect gift exchange? Some experimental evidence. Economic Journal 114: 684–708.
Brown, M., A. Falk, and E. Fehr. 2004. Relational contracts and the nature of market interactions. Econometrica 72: 747–780.
Bull, C., A. Schotter, and K. Weigelt. 1987. Tournaments and piece rates: An experimental study. Journal of Political Economy 95: 1–33.
Card, D., and A. Krueger. 1995. Myth and measurement: The new economics of the minimum wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Falk, A., and E. Fehr. 2003. Why labor market experiments? Labor Economics 10: 399–406.
Falk, A., and D. Huffman. 2007. Studying labor market institutions in the lab: Minimum wages, employment protection and workfare. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 163: 30–45.
Falk, A., E. Fehr, and C. Zehnder. 2006. Fairness perceptions and reservation wages: The behavioral effects of minimum wage laws. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 1347–1381.
Fehr, E., and A. Falk. 1999. Wage rigidity in a competitive incomplete contract market. Journal of Political Economy 107: 106–134.
Fehr, E., and A. Falk. 2002. The psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review 46: 687–724.
Fehr, E., and S. Gächter. 2000. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 159–181.
Fehr, E., G. Kirchsteiger, and A. Riedl. 1993. Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 437–460.
Fehr, E., E. Kirchler, A. Weichbold, and S. Gächter. 1998. When social norms overpower competition – Gift exchange in experimental labor markets. Journal of Labor Economics 16: 324–351.
Gächter, S., and A. Falk. 2002. Reputation and reciprocity: Consequences for the labour relation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104: 1–27.
Gächter, S., and E. Fehr. 2002. Fairness in the labour market: A survey of experimental results. In Surveys in experimental economics. Bargaining, cooperation and election stock markets, ed. B. Friedel and M. Lehmann- Waffenschmidt. Heidelberg/New York: Physica.
Gneezy, U., and A. Rustichini. 2000. A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies 29: 1–17.
Lazear, P., and S. Rosen. 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy 89: 841–864.
MacLeod, B., and J. Malcomson. 1998. Motivation and markets. American Economic Review 88: 388–411.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Falk, A., Gächter, S. (2018). Experimental Labour Economics. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2005
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2005
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences