The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Recursive Preferences

  • David K. Backus
  • Bryan R. Routledge
  • Stanley E. Zin
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1963

Abstract

Recursive preferences characterize the trade-offs between current and future consumption by summarizing the future with a single index, the certainty equivalent of next period’s utility. Recursive utility functions are built from two components. A risk aggregator encodes trade-offs across the outcomes of a static gamble and, hence, defines the certainty equivalent of future utility. A time aggregator encodes trade-offs between current consumption and the certainty equivalent of future utility. We suggest functional forms for time and risk aggregators with desirable properties for applications in economics and finance, such as the standard intertemporal consumption/portfolio problem, which we solve using dynamic programming.

Keywords

Bellman equation Certainty equivalent Disappointment aversion Dynamic optimization Elasticity of intertemporal substitution Expected utility Impatience Infinite horizons Preferences Rational expectations Recursive preferences Risk aggregator Risk aversion Stochastic dynamic models Time aggregator Time preference Utility functions Weighted utility 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Backus, D.K., Routledge, B.R. and Zin, S.E. 2004. Exotic preferences for macroeconomists. NBER macroeconomics annual 2004 , vol. 19 M. Gertler K. Rogoff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chew, S.H. 1983. A generalization of the quasi-linear mean with applications to the measurement of inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox. Econometrica 51: 1065–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chew, S.H. 1989. Axiomatic utility theories with the betweenness property. Annals of Operations Research 19: 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dekel, E. 1986. An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom. Journal of Economic Theory 40: 304–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Epstein, L.G., and J.A. Hynes. 1983. The rate of time preference and dynamic economic analysis. Journal of Political Economy 91: 611–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein, L.G., and M. Schneider. 2003. Recursive multiple-priors. Journal of Economic Theory 113: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Epstein, L.G., and S.E. Zin. 1989. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica 57: 937–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epstein, L.G., and S.E. Zin. 2001. The independence axiom and asset returns. Journal of Empirical Finance 8: 537–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 1993. Updating ambiguous beliefs. Journal of Economic Theory 59: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gul, F. 1991. A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59: 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2004. Misspecification in recursive macroeconomic theory. Manuscript: University of Chicago, January.Google Scholar
  12. Koopmans, T.C. 1960. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28: 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kreps, D.M. 1988. Notes on the theory of choice. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kreps, D.M., and E.L. Porteus. 1978. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucas, R.E., and N.L. Stokey. 1984. Optimal growth with many consumers. Journal of Economic Theory 32: 139–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Routledge, B.R. and Zin, S.E. 2003. Generalized disappointment aversion and asset prices. Working Paper No. 10107. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  17. Shi, S. 1994. Weakly nonseparable preferences and distortionary taxes in a small open economy. International Economic Review 35: 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Starmer, C. 2000. Developments in non-expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 332–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Uzawa, H. 1968. Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings. In Value, capital, and growth: Papers in honour of Sir John Hicks, ed. J.N. Wolfe. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David K. Backus
    • 1
  • Bryan R. Routledge
    • 1
  • Stanley E. Zin
    • 1
  1. 1.