Education Production Functions
The accumulated economic analysis of education suggests that current provision of schooling is very inefficient. Commonly purchased inputs to schools – class size, teacher experience, and teacher education – bear little systematic relationship to student outcomes, implying that conventional input policies are unlikely to improve achievement. At the same time, differences in teacher quality have been shown to be very important. Unfortunately, teacher quality, defined in terms of effects on student performance, is not closely related to salaries or readily identified attributes of teachers.
KeywordsEducation production functions Random assignment School attainment School resources Student outcomes Teacher quality
- Coleman, J.S., E.Q. Campbell, C.J. Hobson, J. McPartland, A.M. Mood, F.D. Weinfeld, and R.L. York. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Lazear, E.P. 2003. Teacher incentives. Swedish Economic Policy Review 10(3): 179–214.Google Scholar
- Mincer, J. 1970. The distribution of labor incomes: A survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature 8: 1–26.Google Scholar
- Word, E., J. Johnston, H.P. Bain, B. DeWayne Fulton, J.B. Zaharies, M.N. Lintz, C.M. Achilles, J. Folger, and C. Breda. 1990. Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR), Tennessee’s K-3 class size study: Final summary report, 1985–1990. Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education.Google Scholar