The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Real and Nominal Quantities

  • R. O’Donnell
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1809

Abstract

Adam Smith, in his Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations of 1776, distinguished between the nominal price and the real price of commodities. He defined the nominal price of a commodity as its price in silver or gold and the real price as the quantity of labour which it can purchase or ‘command’. In other words, he adopted the money wage of ordinary labour as his standard of value. Ever since the critical commentaries of Ricardo and Marx this choice of standard has been seen by many as evidence that Smith’s measure and theory of value were confused or inconsistent (see Ricardo, Works I, pp. 14–15; Marx 1861–63, I, pp. 69–77; II, pp. 200, 369; and Douglas 1928). More recently there has been a rejection of the view that Smith confused labour embodied and labour commanded and, as Hollander says, ‘the issue at hand, it is now generally recognized, corresponds to the modern “index number” problem of estimating changes in “real income” over space and time’ (Hollander 1973, p. 127; see also Schumpeter 1954, p. 127 and Blaug 1978, pp. 51–3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bladen, V.W. 1975. Command over labour: A study in misinterpretation. Canadian Journal of Economics 8(4): 504–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaug, M. 1978. Economic theory in retrospect, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bowley, M. 1973. Studies in the history of economic theory before 1870. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Douglas, P. 1928. Adam Smith’s theory of value and distribution. In Adam Smith’, ed. J.M. Clark et al., 1776–1926. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hollander, S. 1973. The economics of Adam Smith. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Marx, K. 1861–63. Theories of surplus value. In 3 parts. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1969–72.Google Scholar
  7. O’Brien, D.P. 1975. The classical economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ricardo, D. 1821. Principles of political economy. In Works and correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. I, ed. P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M.H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  9. Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of economic analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 2 vols, ed. R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Sylos-Labini, P. 1976. Competition: The product market. In The market and the state: Essays in honour of Adam Smith, ed. T. Wilson and A.S. Skinner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. O’Donnell
    • 1
  1. 1.