Abstract
Structural change is a complex, intertwined phenomenon, not only because economic growth brings about complementary changes in various aspects of the economy, such as the sector compositions of output and employment and the organization of industry, but also because these changes in turn affect the growth process. Using a simple two-sector model, we highlight some driving forces behind structural change, attempt to convey the complexity of the phenomenon and identify some key issues discussed in the literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Acemoglu, D., and F. Zilibotti. 1997. Was Prometheus unbounded by chance?: Risk, diversification and growth. Journal of Political Economy 105: 709–751.
Banerjee, A., and A. Newman. 1998. Information, the dual economy, and development. Review of Economic Studies 65: 631–653.
Brezis, E., P. Krugman, and D. Tsiddon. 1993. Leapfrogging in international competition: A theory of cycles in national technology leadership. American Economic Review 83: 1211–1219.
Caselli, F., and W. Coleman II. 2001. The US structural transformation and regional convergence. Journal of Political Economy 109: 584–616.
Chenery, H., and M. Syrquin. 1975. Patterns of development, 1957–1970. London: Oxford University Press.
Ciccone, A., and K. Matsuyama. 1996. Start-up costs and pecuniary externalities in economic development. Journal of Development Economics 49: 33–57.
Clark, C. 1940. The conditions of economic progress. London: Macmillan.
Fafchamps, M. 1997. Mobile capital, local externalities, and industrialization. Journal of Comparative Economics 25: 345–365.
Fafchamps, M., and B. Helms. 1996. Local demand, investment multipliers, and industrialization. Journal of Development Economics 49: 61–92.
Fisher, A. 1939. Primary, secondary and tertiary production. The Economic Record 15: 24–38.
Foellmi, R. and Zweimüller, J. 2002. Structural change and Kaldor facts of economic growth. Working Paper No. 111. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
Gollin, D., S. Parente, and R. Rogerson. 2002. The role of agriculture in development. American Economic Review 92: 160–164.
Gurley, J., and E. Shaw. 1995. Financial aspects of economic development. American Economic Review 45: 515–538.
Hansen, G., and E. Prescott. 2002. Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review 92: 1205–1217.
Harris, J., and M. Todaro. 1970. Migration, unemployment, and development: A two-sector analysis. American Economic Review 60: 126–142.
Krugman, P., and A. Venables. 1995. Globalization and inequality of nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 857–880.
Kuznets, S. 1966. Modern economic growth. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Laitner, J. 2000. Structural change and economic growth. Review of Economic Studies 67: 541–561.
Lewis, A. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School 22: 139–191.
Lucas, R. Jr. 1993. Making a miracle. Econometrica 61: 251–272.
Lucas, R. Jr. 2004. Life earnings and rural-urban migrations. Journal of Political Economy 112: S29–S59.
Matsuyama, K. 1991. Increasing returns, industrialization, and indeterminacy of equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 617–650.
Matsuyama, K. 1992a. Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory 58: 317–334.
Matsuyama, K. 1992b. A simple model of sectoral adjustments. Review of Economic Studies 59: 375–388.
Matsuyama, K. 1995. Complementarities and cumulative processes in models of monopolistic competition. Journal of Economic Literature 33: 701–729.
Matsuyama, K. 1996a. Economic development as coordination problems. In The role of Government in East Asian development, comparative institutional analysis, ed. M. Aoki, H. Kim, and M. Okuno-Fujiwara. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matsuyama, K. 1996b. Why are there rich and poor countries? Symmetry-breaking in the world economy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 10: 419–439.
Matsuyama, K. 1997. The 1996 Nakahara Lecture: Complementarity, instability and multiplicity. The Japanese Economic Review 48: 240–266.
Matsuyama, K. 1998. Productivity-based theory of manufacturing decline: An international perspective. Mimeo: Northwestern University.
Matsuyama, K. 2002. The rise of mass consumption societies. Journal of Political Economy 110: 1035–1070.
Murphy, K., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1989. Income distribution, market size, and industrialization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 537–564.
Puga, D., and A. Venables. 1996. The spread of industry; spatial agglomeration and economic development. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 10: 440–464.
Rodriguez-Clare, A. 1996. The division of labor and economic development. Journal of Development Economics 49: 3–32.
Romer, P. 1987. Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review 77: 56–62.
Rostow, W. 1960. The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. London: Cambridge University Press.
Saint-Paul, G. 1992. Technology choice, financial markets and economic development. European Economic Review 36: 763–781.
Stokey, N. 1988. Learning-by-doing and the introduction of new goods. Journal of Political Economy 96: 701–717.
Watkins, M. 1963. A staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 29: 141–158.
Young, A. 1928. Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal 38: 527–542.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Matsuyama, K. (2018). Structural Change. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1775
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1775
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences