The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Prebisch, Raúl (1901–1986)

  • José Gabriel Palma
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1719

Abstract

Prebisch was concerned with four stylized facts of commodity-exporting middle- income countries: (a) failure to ‘catch-up’; (b) recurrent balance of payments disequilibrium; (c) unstable and deteriorating terms of trade; and (d) persistent unemployment. At the core of Prebisch’s analysis lies his differentiation of the economic and export structures of the centre and periphery. Those of the centre were seen as homogeneous and diversified, those of the periphery as heterogeneous and over-specialized. Prebisch associates the second and third problems above primarily with export over-specialization (too few homogeneous, unbranded and price-volatile commodities), and the first and fourth with structural heterogeneity (which hindered industrialization).

Keywords

Balance of payments Commodity-exporting countries Comparative advantage Cooperative games Excess demand Kaldor, N. Import substitution Industrialization Long-term economic growth Periphery Prebisch, R. Robinson, J. V. Structuralism Terms of trade 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Di Marco, L.E. 1972. The evolution of Prebisch’s economic thought. In International economics and development: Essays in honour of Raul Prebisch, ed. L.E. Di Marco. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Kaldor, N. 1967. Problems of industrialization in underdeveloped countries. In Strategic factors of economic development. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Keynes, J.M. 1920. Economic consequences of the peace. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Khan, M. 2000. Rent-seeking as process. In Rents, rent-seeking and economic development, ed. M. Khan and K. Jomo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Love, J. 1995. Economic ideas and ideologies in Latin America since 1930. In Cambridge history of Latin America. vol. 6, part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Mill, J.S. 1848. Principles of political economy. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  7. Ocampo, J.A., and M.A. Parra. 2003. The terms of trade for commodities in the twentieth century. ECLAC Review 29: 7–35.Google Scholar
  8. Palma, J.G. 2005. The six main stylised facts of the Mexican economy since NAFTA. Journal of Industrial and Corporate Change 14: 941–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palma, J.G. 2007. Flying geese and waddling ducks: The different capabilities of East Asia and Latin America to ‘demand-adapt’ and ‘supply upgrade’ their export productive capacity. In Industrial policy in developing countries, ed. M. Cimoli, G. Dosi, and J. Stiglitz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pasinetti, L. 1983. The accumulation of capital. Cambridge Journal of Economics 7: 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Robinson, J.V. 1979. Aspects of development and underdevelopment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rodriguez, O. 1980. La teoría del subdesarrollo de la CEPAL. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
  13. Rodriguez, O. 2007. El estructuralismo latinoamericano. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
  14. Rowthorn, R., and J. Wells. 1987. De-industrialisation and foreign trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Singer, H. 1950. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review 40: 473–485.Google Scholar
  16. Singh, A. 1977. UK industry and the world economy: a case of de-industrialisation? Cambridge Journal of Economics 1: 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thirlwall, A. 2003. Trade, the balance of payments and exchange rate policy in developing countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Gabriel Palma
    • 1
  1. 1.