The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Over-Saving

  • Michael Bleaney
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1680

Abstract

The possibility that saving could disrupt the circulation of commodities through a lack of demand was recognized at least as early as the Physiocrats. A similar argument was presented by Adam Smith. However, in both cases the analysis referred only to hoarding (i.e., the accumulation of a stock of money outside the banking system) and not to savings which were lent at interest to finance investment. Indeed both Smith and the Physiocrats regarded saving in order to transfer resources to investment with favour and were anxious to promote it. In neither case was the possibility that planned savings and planned investment could diverge examined (other than by hoarding, which was dismissed by Smith as irrational because of the loss of interest involved and therefore by implication insignificant), so that there was an implicit assumption that a decision to save was also a decision to invest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bleaney, M.F. 1976. Underconsumption theories: A history and critical analysis. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  2. Costabile, L., and R.E. Rowthorn. 1985. Malthus’s theory of wages and growth. Economic Journal 95: 418–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cowling, K. 1982. Monopoly capitalism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eltis, W.A. 1984. The classical theory of economic growth. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hilferding, R. 1910. Finance capital. Trans. M. Wathnick and S. Gordon, ed. T. Bottomore. London: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Hobson, J.A. 1902. Imperialism. London: Nisbet.Google Scholar
  7. Hobson, J.A. 1909. The industrial system. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. Hobson, J.A. 1922. The economics of unemployment. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Kaldor, N. 1955–6. Alternative theories of distribution. Review of Economic Studies 23: 83–100.Google Scholar
  10. Lauderdale, Earl of. 1804. An inquiry into the nature and origin of public wealth. Edinburgh: Constable.Google Scholar
  11. Mill, J. 1808. Commerce defended. London/Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1966.Google Scholar
  12. Spence, W. 1808. Britain independent of commerce, 4th ed. London: Cadell & Davies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bleaney
    • 1
  1. 1.