# Stability

**DOI:**https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1678

## Abstract

The central place of the concept of equilibrium in economic theory justifies the interest of economists in stability (a concept they employ in the same sense as mathematicians and physicists, as the quotations show). In fact, an equilibrium which (supposing that it has been hit upon by chance) is such that the slightest disturbance starts a movement away from it – i.e., an unstable equilibrium – is usually considered unmeaningful from an economic point of view. Besides, the comparative static and/or comparative dynamic analysis of an equilibrium, which are among the main tools of the trade, become useless if the equilibrium is unstable. The concern over stability, which dates back at least to Marshall (1879a) and Walras (1874; for a discussion of the priority problem see Jaffé’s note 5 to lesson 7, pp. 502–3 in his translation of Walras’s *Elements*), has led economists either to *assume* that equilibrium is stable (this involves the study of the necessary stability conditions and their use in comparative statics) or to search for ‘plausible’ conditions which *ensure* stability; these are usually *sufficient* stability conditions only (this is, for example, the approach taken in the study of the stability of general competitive equilibrium). However, in some cases, the presence of *instability* is an essential feature as, for example, in Hicks’s trade cycle model (1950). Therefore the epistemological question arises of whether stability is a good ontologically (and instability an evil) or not. This problem will be discussed in the last section.

## Bibliography

- Andronov, A.A., A.A. Vitt, and S.E. Khaikin. 1966.
*Theory of oscillators*. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar - Bellman, R. 1953.
*Stability theory of differential equations*. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Blatt, J.M. 1983.
*Dynamic economic systems – A post Keynesian approach*. Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar - Coddington, E.A., and N. Levinson. 1955.
*Theory of ordinary differential equations*. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Dore, M.H.I. 1985. On the concept of equilibrium.
*Journal of Post Keynesian Economics*7(2): 193–206, 1984–5.Google Scholar - Edgeworth, F.Y. 1881.
*Mathematical psychics*. London: Kegan Paul. Reprinted, A.M. Kelley: New York, 1967.Google Scholar - Fisher, F.M. 1983.
*Disequilibrium foundations of equilibrium economics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Frisch, R. 1936. On the notion of equilibrium and disequilibrium.
*Review of Economic Studies*3: 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gandolfo, G. 1980.
*Economic dynamics: Methods and models*. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar - Gandolfo, G. 1981.
*Qualitative analysis and econometric estimation of continuous time dynamic models*. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar - Gandolfo, G., and P.C. Padoan. 1980.
*A disequilibrium model of real and financial accumulation in an open economy*. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar - Goodwin, R.M. 1982.
*Essays in economic dynamics*. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hahn, F.A. 1982. Stability. In
*Handbook of mathematical economics*, vol. II, ed. K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar - Haken, H. 1983a.
*Synergetics – An introduction*, 3rd ed. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Haken, H. 1983b.
*Advanced synergetics*. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar - Hicks, J.R. 1939.
*Value and capital*, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd ed., 1946.Google Scholar - Hicks, J.R. 1950.
*A contribution to the theory of the trade cycle*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Hirsch, M.W., and S. Smale. 1974.
*Differential equations, dynamical systems, and linear algebra*. New York: Academic.Google Scholar - Kaldor, N. 1934. A classificatory note on the determinateness of equilibrium.
*Review of Economic Studies*1: 122–136. Reprinted as Determinateness of static equilibrium. In*Essays on value and distribution*, ed. N. Kaldor. London: G.Duckworth, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kalman, R.E., and J.E. Bertram. 1960. Control system analysis and design via the ‘second method’ of Lyapunov, Part I.
*Transactions of the ASME. Series D, Journal of Basic Engineering*82(2): 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Krasovskii, N.N. 1963.
*Stability of motion – Applications of Lyapunov’s second method to differential systems and equations with delay*. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar - LaSalle, J.P., and S. Lefschetz. 1961.
*Stability by Liapunov’s direct method with applications*. New York: Academic.Google Scholar - Lotka, A.J. 1925.
*Elements of physical biology*. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. Reprinted as*Elements of mathematical biology*. New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar - Marshall, A. 1879a.
*The pure theory of foreign trade*. Privately published. 1879b.*The pure theory of domestic values*. Privately printed and circulated. Reprinted with Marshall (1879a) in one vol. in the London School of Economics Series, Reprints of Scarce Tracts in Economics and Political Science, No. 1, London: London School of Economics and Political Science, 1930.Google Scholar - Marshall, A. 1890.
*Principles of economics*. London: Macmillan. 8th ed., 1920. 9th (Variorum) edn, ed. C.W. Guillebaud, 1961.Google Scholar - Medio, A. 1984. Synergetics and dynamic economic models. In
*Non-linear models of fluctuating growth*, ed. R.M. Goodwin, M. Krüger, and A. Vercelli. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar - Minorsky, N. 1962.
*Nonlinear oscillations*. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar - Newman, P. 1961. Approaches to stability analysis.
*Economica*28: 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Samuelson, P.A. 1947.
*Foundations of economic analysis*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Enlarged edn, 1983.Google Scholar - Sansone, G., and R. Conti. 1964.
*Non-linear differential equations*. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar - Silverberg, G. 1984. Embodied technical progress in a dynamic model: The self-organization paradigm. In
*Nonlinear models of fluctuating growth*, ed. R.M. Goodwin, M. Krüger, and A. Vercelli. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar - Thom, R. 1972.
*Stabilité structurelle et morphogénèse*. Trans. as*Structural stability and morphogenesis*. Reading: Benjamin, 1975.Google Scholar - Varian, H.R. 1981. Dynamical systems with applications to economics. In
*Handbook of mathematical economics*, vol. I, ed. K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar - Vercelli, A. 1982. Is instability enough to discredit a model?
*Economic Notes*3: 173–190.Google Scholar - Walras, L. 1874.
*Eléments d’économie politique pure*. Lausanne: Corbaz et Cie. Definitive edn, Paris: Pichon et Durand Auzias, 1926. Trans. with notes and collation of editions by W. Jaffé as*Elements of pure economics*. London: Allen & Unwin, 1954.Google Scholar