The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Social Security

  • Laurence J. Kotlikoff
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1677

Abstract

Since Bismarck’s introduction of social security in Germany in 1891 a large number of countries have adopted social security systems. The growth of social security in the postwar period has been particularly rapid. In some countries, such as the United States, social security has become a major, if not the major fiscal institution. Because of its scale, method of finance, and role in providing insurance, social security may be greatly influencing the performance of a number of economies, particularly with respect to their rates of saving and employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Ando, A., and F. Modigliani. 1963. The ‘life cycle’ hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests. American Economic Review 53: 55–84.Google Scholar
  2. Auerbach, A.J., and L.G. Kotlikoff. 1986. Life insurance of the elderly: Adequacy and determinants. In Work, health, and income among the elderly, ed. Gary Burtless.Google Scholar
  3. Auerbach, A.J., and L.J. Kotlikoff. 1987. Dynamic fiscal policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R.J. 1974. Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82(6): 1095–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R.J. 1978. Social security and private saving – Evidence from the U.S. time series. In Studies in social security and retirement policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Boskin, J.M., and M. Hurd. 1984. The effects of social security on retirement in the early 1970s. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(4): 767–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond, P.A. 1977. A framework for social security ‘analysis’. Journal of Public Economics 8: 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diamond, P.A., and J.A. Mirrlees. 1978. A model of social insurance with variable retirement. Journal of Public Economics 10(3): 295–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldstein, M. 1974. Social security, induced retirement, and aggregate capital accumulation. Journal of Political Economy 82(5), Part 2: 905–26.Google Scholar
  10. Kotlikoff, L.J. 1979. Social security and equilibrium capital intensity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 93(2): 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kotlikoff, L.J., and A. Spivak. 1981. The family as an incomplete annuities market. Journal of Political Economy 89(2): 372–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotlikoff, L.J., J.B. Shoven, and A. Spivak. 1986. The effect of annuity insurance on savings and inequality. Journal of Labor Economics 4(3), Part 2: 183–207.Google Scholar
  13. Merton, R.C. 1983. On the role of social security as a means for efficient risk-bearing in an economy where human capital is not tradeable. In Financial aspects of the U.S, Pension system, ed. Z. Bodie and J.B. Shoven. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Modigliani, F., and R. Brumberg. 1954. Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. In Post-Keynesian economics, ed. K.K. Kurihara. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rothschild, M., and J. Stiglitz. 1976. Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(4): 630–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Samuelson, P.A. 1958. An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy 66(6): 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence J. Kotlikoff
    • 1
  1. 1.