The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Efficient Allocation

  • Stanley Reiter
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_164

Abstract

Analysis of efficiency in the context of resource allocation has been a central concern of economic theory from ancient times, and is an essential element of modern microeconomic theory. The ends of economic action are seen to be the satisfaction of human wants through the provision of goods and services. These are supplied by production and exchange and limited by scarcity of resources and technology. In this context efficiency means going as far as possible in the satisfaction of wants within resource and technological constraints. This is expressed by the concept of Pareto optimality, which can be stated informally as follows: a state of affairs is Pareto optimal if it is within the given constraints and it is not the case that everyone can be made better off in his own view by changing to another state of affairs that satisfies the applicable constraints.

JEL Classifications

D5 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, K. 1951. An extension of the basic theorems of classical welfare economics. In Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, ed. J. Neyman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K., and G. Debreu. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22 (July): 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K., and F. Hahn. 1971. General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K., and L. Hurwicz. 1960. Decentralization and computation in resource allocation. In Essays in economics and econometrics, ed. R.W. Pfouts, 34–104. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K., L. Hurwicz, and H. Uzawa. 1961. Constraint qualifications in maximization problems. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 8 (2): 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benveniste, L. 1976. Two notes on the Malinvaud condition for efficiency of infinite horizon programs. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benveniste, L., and D. Gale. 1975. An extension of Cass’ characterization of infinite efficient production programs. Journal of Economic Theory 10: 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bewley, T. 1972. Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities. Journal of Economic Theory 4: 514–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bose, A. 1974. Pareto optimality and efficient capital accumulation. Discussion paper no. 74–4. Department of Economics, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, D., and G. Heal 1982. Existence, local-uniqueness and optimality of a marginal cost pricing equilibrium in an economy with increasing returns. Cal. Tech. Social Science working paper no. 415.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, D., G. Heal, M. Ali Khan, and R. Vohra. 1986. On a general existence theorem for marginal cost pricing equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory 38: 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calsamiglia, X. 1977. Decentralized resource allocation and increasing returns. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calsamiglia, X. 1982. On the size of the message space under non-convexities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 10: 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cass, D. 1972. On capital over-accumulation in the aggregative neoclassical model of economic growth: A complete characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 4 (2): 200–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dantzig, G.B. 1951a. The programming of interdependent activities. In Activity analysis of production and allocation, ed. T. Koopmans, 19–32, Cowles Commission Monograph No. 13. New York: Wiley, ch. 2.Google Scholar
  16. Dantzig, G.B. 1951b. Maximization of a linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities. In Activity analysis of production and allocation, ed. T. Koopmans, 339–347, Cowles Commission Monograph No. 13, New York: Wiley, ch. 21.Google Scholar
  17. Dasgupta, P., P. Hammond, and E. Maskin. 1979. The implementation of social choice rules: Some general results on incentive compatibility. Review of Economic Studies 46: 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, O.A., and A.B. Whinston. 1962. Externalities welfare and the theory of games. Journal of Political Economy 70: 214–262.Google Scholar
  19. Debreu, G. 1954. Valuation equilibrium and Pareto optimum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 40 (7): 588–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Debreu, G. 1970. Economies with a finite set of equilibria. Econometrica 38 (3): 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diamond, P., and J. Mirrlees. 1971. Optimal taxation and public production. I: Production efficiency; II: Tax rules. American Economic Review 61: 8–27. 261–78.Google Scholar
  23. Domar, E. 1946. Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment. Econometrica 14 (April): 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fenchel, W. 1950. Convex cones, sets, and functions. Princeton University (hectographed).Google Scholar
  25. Guesnerie, R. 1975. Pareto optimality in non-convex economies. Econometrica 43: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrod, R.F. 1939. An essay in dynamic theory. Economic Journal 49: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heal, G. 1971. Planning, prices and increasing returns. Review of Economic Studies 38: 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hotelling, H. 1938. The general welfare in relation to problems of taxation and of railway and utility rates. Econometrica 6: 242–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hurwicz, L. 1958. Programming in linear spaces. In Studies in linear and non-linear programming, ed. K. Arrow, L. Hurwicz, and H. Uzawa. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hurwicz, L. 1960. Optimality and informational efficiency in resource allocation processes. In Mathematical methods in the social sciences, 1959, ed. K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hurwicz, L. 1971. Centralization and decentralization in economic processes. In Comparison of economic systems: Theoretical and methodological approaches, ed. A. Eckstein. Berkeley: University of California Press. ch. 3.Google Scholar
  32. Hurwicz, L. 1972a. On informationally decentralized systems. In Decision and organization, ed. C. McGuire and R. Radner, 297–336. Amsterdam/London: North-Holland, ch. 14.Google Scholar
  33. Hurwicz, L. 1972b. On the dimensional requirements of in formationally decentralized Pareto-satisfactory processes. Presented at the conference seminar in decentralization North-western University. In Studies in resource allocation processes, ed. K.J. Arrow and L. Hurwicz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1977.Google Scholar
  34. Hurwicz, L. 1976. On informational requirements for nonwasteful resource allocation systems. In Mathematical models in economics: Papers and proceedings of a US-USSR seminar, Moscow, ed. S. Shulman. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  35. Hurwicz, L. and H. Weinberger 1984. Paper presented at IMA seminar in Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  36. Hurwicz, L., Radner, R., and Reiter, S. 1975. A stochastic decentralized resource allocation process. Econometrica 43: Part I, 187–221; Part II, 363–93.Google Scholar
  37. Jennergren, L. 1971. Studies in the mathematical theory of decentralized resource-allocation. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, L. 1984. A competitive model of commodity differentiation. Econometrica 52: 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kantorovitch, L. 1939. Matematicheskie metody organizatii i planirovania proizvodstva (Mathematical methods in the organization and planning of production). Izdanie Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Leningrad. Trans. in Management Science 6(4), July 1960, 363–422.Google Scholar
  40. Kantorovitch, L. 1942. On the translocation of masses (In English.) Comptes Rendus (Doklady) de l’Academie des Sciences d l’URSS 37(7–8).Google Scholar
  41. Kantorovitch, L., and M. Gavurin 1949. Primenenie matematicheskikh metodov v voprosakh analyza grusopotokov (The application of mathematical methods to problems of freight flow analysis). In Problemy Povysheniia Effektivnosty Raboty Transporta (Problems of raising the efficiency of transportation), ed. V. Zvonkov. Moscow/Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
  42. Koopmans, T.C. 1951a. Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In Activity analysis of production and allocation, ed. T. Koopmans, 33–37, Cowles Commission Monograph No. 13, New York: Wiley, ch. 3.Google Scholar
  43. Koopmans, T.C. 1951b. Efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica 19: 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koopmans, T.C. 1957. Three essays on the state of economic science, 66–104. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Kuhn, H., and A. Tucker. 1951. Nonlinear programming. In Proceedings of the second Berkeley Symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, ed. J. Neyman, 481–492. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ledyard, J. 1968. Resource allocation in unselfish environments. American Economic Review 58: 227–237.Google Scholar
  47. Ledyard, J. 1971. A convergent Pareto-satisfactory non-tâtonnement adjustment process for a class of unselfish exchange environments. Econometrica 39: 467–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lerner, A. 1934. The concept of monopoly and measurement of monopoly power. Review of Economic Studies 1 (3): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lerner, A. 1944. The economics of control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Lipsey, R., and K. Lancaster. 1956. The general theory of second best. Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Majumdar, M. 1970. Some approximation theorems on efficiency prices for infinite programs. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Majumdar, M. 1972. Some general theorems of efficiency prices with an infinite dimensional commodity space. Journal of Economic Theory 5: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Majumdar, M. 1974. Efficient programs in infinite dimensional spaces: A complete characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 7: 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Majumdar, M., T. Mitra, and D. McFadden. 1976. On efficiency and Pareto optimality of competitive programs in closed multisector models. Journal of Economic Theory 13: 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Malinvaud, E. 1953. Capital accumulation and efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica 21: 233–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mas-Colell, A. 1977. Regular nonconvex economies. Econometrica 45: 1387–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McFadden, D., T. Mitra, and M. Majumdar. 1980. Pareto optimality and competitive equilibrium in infinite horizon economies. Journal of Mathematical Economics 7: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McKenzie, L. 1959. On the existence of general equilibrium for a competitive market. Econometrica 27 (1): 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitra, T. 1979. On optimal economic growth with variable discount rates: Existence and stability results. International Economic Review 20: 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mount, K., and S. Reiter. 1974. The informational size of message spaces. Journal of Economic Theory 8: 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mount, K., and S. Reiter. 1977. Economic environments for which there are Pareto satisfactory mechanisms. Econometrica 45: 821–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neumann, J von. 1937. A model of general economic equilibrium. Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums (8). Trans. from German, Review of Economic Studies 13(1), (1945–6): 1–9.Google Scholar
  63. Nikaido, H. 1969. Convex structures and economic theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  64. Nikaido, H. 1970. Introduction to sets and mappings in modern economics. Trans. K. Sato, Amsterdam: North-Holland (Japanese original, Tokyo, 1960).Google Scholar
  65. Osana, H. 1978. On the informational size of message spaces for resource allocation processes. Journal of Economic Theory 17: 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peleg, B., and M. Yaari. 1970. Efficiency prices in an infinite dimensional commodity space. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 41–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pigou, A. 1932. The economics of welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Radner, R. 1967. Efficiency prices for infinite horizon production programs. Review of Economic Studies 34: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ramsey, F. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reichelstein, S. 1984a. Dominant strategy implementation, incentive compatibility and informational requirements. Journal of Economic Theory 34 (1): 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reichelstein, S. 1984b. Information and incentives in economic organizations. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  72. Reichelstein, S. and Reiter, S. 1985. Game forms with minimal strategy spaces. Discussion paper no. 663, The Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.Google Scholar
  73. Reiter, S. 1977. Information and performance in the (new)2 welfare economics. American Economic Review 67: 226–234.Google Scholar
  74. Samuelson, P. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Samuelson, P. 1949. Market mechanisms and maximization, I, II, III, Hectographed memoranda. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  76. Samuelson, P. 1958. An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy 66 (December): 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sato, F. 1981. On the informational size of message spaces for resource allocation processes in economies with public goods. Journal of Economic Theory 24: 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Slater, M. 1950. Lagrange multipliers revisited: A contribution to non-linear programming. Cowles Commission Discussion Paper, Math. 403, also RM–676, 1951.Google Scholar
  79. Sonnenschein, H. 1974. An axiomatic characterization of the price mechanism. Econometrica 42: 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Uzawa, H. 1958. The Kuhn-Tucker Theorem in concave programming. In Studies in linear and non-linear programming, ed. K. Arrow, L. Hurwicz, and H. Uzawa. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. von Hayek, F. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35, 519–553. Reprinted in F. von Hayek, Individualism and economic order, 77–92. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  82. Walker, M. 1977. On the informational size of message spaces. Journal of Economic Theory 15: 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanley Reiter
    • 1
  1. 1.