The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Unequal Exchange

  • Ednaldo Araquem Da Silva
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1444

Abstract

Marxists have long attempted to explain the uneven development of ‘productive forces’ (labour productivity) and the resulting income differences in the world capitalist economy primarily by means of the ‘surplus drain’ hypothesis (see Emmanuel 1972; Andersson 1976). Adopting Prebisch’s division of the world capitalist economy into the ‘centre’ and ‘periphery’, Marxists have argued that surplus transfer has restrained the economic development of the periphery and exacerbated its income gap vis-à-vis the centre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Amin, S. 1977. Imperialism and unequal development. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, J. 1976. Studies in the theory of unequal exchange between nations. Abo: Abo Akademi.Google Scholar
  3. Bacha, E. 1978. An interpretation of unequal exchange from Prebisch–Singer to Emmanuel. Journal of Development Economics 5(4): 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, O. 1973. International trade and imperialism. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Dandekar, V. 1980. Unequal exchange of errors. Economic and Political Weekly 15(13): 645–48. Continued in 16(6): 205–212.Google Scholar
  6. De Janvry, A., and F. Kramer. 1979. The limits of unequal exchange. Review of Radical Political Economics 11(4): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emmanuel, A. 1972. Unequal exchange: A study of the imperialism of trade (with additional comments by Charles Bettelheim). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, D. 1984. A critical assessment of some neo-Marxian trade theories. Journal of Development Studies 20(2): 202–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibson, B. 1980. Unequal exchange: Theoretical issues and empirical findings. Review of Radical Political Economics 12(3): 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, D. 1975. The theory of economic growth: A critique and reformulation. American Economic Review 65(2): 329–337.Google Scholar
  11. Liossatos, P. 1979. Unequal exchange and regional disparities. Papers of the Regional Science Association 45: 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mainwaring, L. 1980. International trade and the transfer of labour values. Journal of Development Studies 17(1): 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marelli, E. 1980. An intersectoral analysis of regional disparities in terms of transfers of surplus value. Revista internazionale di scienze economiche e commerciali 27(6): 507–526.Google Scholar
  14. Okishio, N. 1963. A mathematical note on Marxian theorems. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 91(2): 287–298.Google Scholar
  15. Sau, R. 1984. Underdeveloped capitalism and the general law of value. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  16. Shaikh, A. 1979. Foreign trade and the law of value: Part I. Science and Society 43(3): 281–302. Part II was published in 44(1).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ednaldo Araquem Da Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.