The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Exchange

  • Robert B. Wilson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_136

Abstract

Economic studies of exchange examine processes in which agents obtain gains from trade, e.g. bilateral bargaining and contracting, auctions, and multilateral markets. Prominent descriptive theories include idealized versions that assume agents simply respond to prices that clear markets. Realistic versions recognize effects of procedural rules and strategic behavior, and various impediments such as incomplete or unenforceable contracts, insufficient markets, imperfect information, and incomplete observability. Normative versions design market procedures, contract forms, and settlement rules that strengthen incentives and promote efficient outcomes.

Keywords

Adverse selection Arbitrage Asymmetric information Auctions Bargaining Barter Bundling Coalitions Collusion Commitment Competition Complementary goods Complete information Cores Decentralization Double auctions Edgeworth, F. Y. Efficiency prices Efficient allocation Entry Excess demand and supply Exchange Existence of equilibria Expected utility Fixed-point problems Game theory Impatience Implicit contracts Incentive compatibility Incomplete contracts Incomplete information Incomplete observability Incomplete markets Information aggregation and prices Inside information Labour market contracts Marginal rates of substitution Market design Mechanism design Monopoly rents Moral hazard Multiple equilibria Nonlinear pricing Optimal contracts Preference falsification Price discrimination Principal and agent Prisoner’s dilemma Private information Product differentiation Quality differentiation Rational behaviour Rational expectations Reputation Resale markets Reservation prices Revelation principle Risk sharing Sealed-bid auctions Sequential rationality Shapley value Signalling Specialization Strategic behaviour Temporary equilibrium Terms of trade Uniqueness of equilibrium Vickrey, W. S. Walras, L. Walras’s Law Walrasian exchange model 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89: 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J., and G. Debreu. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22: 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K.J., and F.H. Hahn. 1971. General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  4. Aumann, R.J. 1964. Markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica 32: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ausubel, L.M., P.C. Cramton, and R.J. Deneckere. 2002. Bargaining with incomplete information. In Handbook of game theory, vol. 3, ed. R.J. Aumann and S. Hart. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  6. Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Debreu, G. 1970. Economies with a finite set of equilibria. Econometrica 38: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Debreu, G., and H. Scarf. 1963. A limit theorem on the core of an economy. International Economic Review 4: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1993. Game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gül, F., and A. Postlewaite. 1992. Asymptotic efficiency in large exchange economies with asymmetric information. Econometrica 60: 1273–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gül, F., and H. Sonnenschein. 1988. On delay in bargaining with one-sided uncertainty. Econometrica 56: 601–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gül, F., H. Sonnenschein, and R.B. Wilson. 1986. Foundations of dynamic monopoly and the coase conjecture. Journal of Economic Theory 39: 155–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hildenbrand, W. 1974. Core and equilibria of a large economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hölmstrom, B.R., and P.R. Milgrom. 1986. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55: 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hölmstrom, B.R., and R.B. Myerson. 1983. Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econometrica 51: 1799–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kreps, D.M., P.R. Milgrom, D.J. Roberts, and R.B. Wilson. 1982. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McKenzie, L. 1959. On the existence of general equilibrium for a competitive market. Econometrica 27: 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milgrom, P.R. 1979. A convergence theorem for competitive bidding with differential information. Econometrica 47: 679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milgrom, P.R. 2004. Putting auction theory to work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milgrom, P.R., and N. Stokey. 1982. Information, trade, and common knowledge. Journal of Economic Theory 26: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Myerson, R.B., and M.A. Satterthwaite. 1983. Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Journal of Economic Theory 29: 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radner, R. 1972. Existence of equilibrium of plans, prices and price expectations in a sequence of markets. Econometrica 40: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts, D.J., and A. Postlewaite. 1976. The incentives for price-taking behavior in large exchange economies. Econometrica 44: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberts, D.J., and H. Sonnenschein. 1977. On the foundations of the theory of monopolistic competition. Econometrica 45: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roth, A.E. (ed.). 1995. Game-theoretic models of bargaining. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Roth, A.E., and M. Sotomayor. 1990. Two-sided matching: A study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rubinstein, A. 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Satterthwaite, M.A., and S.R. Williams. 1989. The rate of convergence to efficiency in the buyers’ bid double auction as the market becomes large. Review of Economic Studies 56: 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scarf, H. (With T. Hansen.) 1973. The computation of economic equilibria. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schmeidler, D. 1980. Walrasian analysis via strategic outcome functions. Econometrica 48: 1585–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmeidler, D., and K. Vind. 1972. Fair net trades. Econometrica 40: 637–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, V. 1982. Microeconomic systems as experimental science. American Economic Review 72: 923–955.Google Scholar
  33. Sonnenschein, H. 1972. Market excess demand functions. Econometrica 40: 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sonnenschein, H. 1974. An axiomatic characterization of the price mechanism. Econometrica 42: 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spence, A.M. 1973. Market signalling: Information transfer in hiring and related process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16: 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, R.B. 1985. Incentive efficiency of double auctions. Econometrica 53: 1101–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson, R.B. 1993. Design of efficient trading procedures. In The double auction market: Institutions, theories, and evidence, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, ed. D. Friedman and J. Rust. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.