The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Methodology

  • Lawrence A. Boland
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1269

Abstract

The term ‘methodology’ refers to the study of methods, usually, the study of scientific method. For most of this century, the concept of a scientific method was that of a multi-stage recipe. In particular, it was the one alleged to be used by successful scientists for more than 300 years. The typical high-school science textbook started with a description of this allegedly successful, and thus proper, method of scientific investigation. It said, for example, that all science begins, as the first step, with the collection of data. The second step was the formation of an ‘hypothesis’ concerning the collected data and the third step was the formation of an experiment to test this hypothesis. If the hypothesis passed the test it was given the title of a ‘theory’. If the theory survived the tests of other scientists, perhaps after years, then the theory was called a ‘Law’. The key lesson that aspiring scientists were thereby taught was that if they were methodologically careful collecting their data and forming and testing their hypotheses, they were assured of success – and perhaps even rewarded with fame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Blaug, M. 1980. The methodology of economics: Or how economists explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boland, L. 1979. A critique of Friedman’s critics. Journal of Economic Literature 17: 503–522.Google Scholar
  3. Boland, L. 1982. The foundations of economic method. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. Caldwell, B. 1982. Beyond positivism: Economic methodology in the twentieth century. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, M. 1953. On the methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics, ed. M. Friedman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. McCloskey, D. 1983. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 481–517.Google Scholar
  7. Robbins, L. 1932. An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Samuelson, P. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Samuelson, P. 1963. Problems of methodology: Discussion. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 53: 231–236.Google Scholar
  10. Samuelson, P. 1965. Professor Samuelson on theory and realism: Reply. American Economic Review 55: 1164–1172.Google Scholar
  11. Wong, S. 1978. The foundations of Paul Samuelson’s revealed preference theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence A. Boland
    • 1
  1. 1.