The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Leontief Paradox

  • Edward E. Leamer
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1257

Abstract

Using 1947 US input–output tables and data on exports and imports, Leontief (1953) found, to the surprise of the profession, that the capital per worker of US exports was less than the capital per worker of US import substitutes. The response to this empirical ‘paradox’ was the formulation of theory that might explain why a capital abundant country had labour-intensive exports. These were the first (confused) steps in an ongoing process of making the theory and data conform sufficiently to enable us comfortably to claim to understand the basis for international trade.

Keywords

Factor content of trade Factor mobility Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson trade model Leontief paradox 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Bowen, H., E. Leamer, and L. Sveikauskas. 1987. Multicountry, multifactor tests of the factor abundance theory. American Economic Review 77: 791–809.Google Scholar
  2. Brecher, R., and E. Choudhri. 1982. The Leontief paradox, continued. Journal of Political Economy 90: 820–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chacholiades, M. 1978. International trade theory and policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Conway, P. 2002. The case of the missing trade and other mysteries: Comment. American Economic Review 92: 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leamer, E. 1980. The Leontief paradox, reconsidered. Journal of Political Economy 88: 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Leontief, W. 1953. Domestic production and foreign trade: The American capital position re-examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 97: 332–349. Reprinted in Readings in international trade, ed. H. Johnson and R. Caves. Homewood: R.D. Irwin. 1968.Google Scholar
  7. Trefler, D. 1995. The case of the missing trade and other mysteries. American Economic Review 85: 1029–1046.Google Scholar
  8. Vanek, J. 1968. The factor proportions theory: The N-factor case. Kyklos 21: 749–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Williams, J. 1970. The resource content in international trade. Canadian Journal of Economics 3: 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward E. Leamer
    • 1
  1. 1.