Abstract
‘Interest’ or ‘interests’ is one of the most central and controversial concepts in economics and, more generally, in social science and history. Since coming into widespread use in various European countries around the latter part of the 16th century as essentially the same Latinderived word (intérêt, interesse, etc.), the concept has stood for the fundamental forces, based on the drive for self-preservation and self-aggrandizement, that motivate or should motivate the actions of the prince or the state, of the individual, and later of groups of people occupying a similar social or economic position (classes, interest groups). When related to the individual, the concept has at times had a very inclusive meaning, encompassing interest in honour, glory, self-respect, and even after-life, while at other times it became wholly confined to the drive for economic advantage. The esteem in which interest-motivated behaviour is held has also varied drastically. The term was originally pressed into service as a euphemism serving, already in the late Middle Ages, to make respectable an activity, the taking of interest on loans, that had long been considered contrary to divine law and known as the sin of usury. In its wider meanings, the term at times achieved enormous prestige as key to a workable and peaceful social order. But it has also been attacked as degrading to the human spirit and corrosive of the foundations of society. An inquiry into these multiple meanings and appreciations is in effect an exploration of much of economic history and in particular of the history of economic and political doctrine in the West over the past four centuries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Ball, T. 1983. The ontological presuppositions and political consequences of a social science. In Changing social science, ed. D.R. Sabia Jr. and J.T. Wallulis. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Boulding, K.E. 1973. The economy of love and fear: A preface to grants economics. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Burke, E. 1790. Reflections on the revolution in France. Chicago: Regnery, 1955.
Carlyle, T. 1843. Past and present. New York: New York University Press, 1977.
Collard, D. 1978. Altruism and economy: A study in non-selfish economics. Oxford: Robertson.
Collini, S., D. Winch, and J. Burrow. 1983. That noble science of politics: A study in nineteenth-century intellectual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, A. 1784. Letters from Phocion, number I. In The works of Alexander Hamilton, ed. John C. Hamilton. New York: C.S. Francis, 1851, Vol. II, 322.
Himmelfarb, G. 1984. The idea of poverty: England in the early industrial age. New York: Knopf.
Hirschman, A.O. 1977. The passions and the interests: Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hirschman, A.O. 1982a. Rival interpretations of market society: Civilizing, destructive, or feeble? Journal of Economic Literature 20(4): 1463–1484.
Hirschman, A.O. 1982b. Shifting involvements: Private interest and public action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hirschman, A.O. 1985. Against parsimony: Three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. Economics and Philosophy 1: 7–21.
Hume, D. 1742. In Essays moral, political and literary, ed. T.H. Green and T.H. Grose. London: Longmans, 1898.
Keynes, J.M. 1936. The general theory of employment interest and money. London: Macmillan.
Macaulay, T.B. 1829. Mill’s essay on government. In Utilitarian logic and politics, ed. J. Lively and J. Rees. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.
McPherson, M.S. 1984. Limits on self-seeking: The role of morality in economic life. In Neoclassical political economy, ed. D.C. Colander, 71–85. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Margolis, H. 1982. Selfishness, altruism and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meinecke, F. 1924. Die Idee der Staatsräson in der Neueren Geschichte. Munich: Oldenburg.
Mill, J. 1820. Essay on government. In Utilitarian logic and politics, ed. J. Lively and J. Rees. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.
O’Donnell, G. 1986. On the convergences of Hirschman’s exit, voice and loyalty and shifting involvements. In Development, democracy and the art of trespassing: Essays in honor of A.O. Hirschman, ed. A. Foxley et al. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Phelps, E.S. (ed.). 1975. Altruism, morality and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Pocock, J.G.A. 1982. The political economy of Burke’s analysis of the French revolution. Historical Journal 25: 331–349.
Rohan, H., Duc de. 1638. De l’interêt des princes et états de la chrétiénité. Paris: Pierre Margat.
Schelling, T.C. 1984. Choice and consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J.A. 1911. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.
Sen, A. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4): 317–344.
Smith, A. 1776. In An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. E. Cannan. New York: Modern Library, 1937.
Steuart, J. 1767. In Inquiry into the principles of political oeconomy, ed. A.S. Skinner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.
Winch, D. 1985. The Burke–Smith problem and late eighteenth century political and economic thought. Historical Journal 28(1): 231–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hirschman, A.O. (2018). Interests. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1193
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1193
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences