The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Malthus’s Theory of Population

  • D. R. Weir
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1062

Abstract

It is often said that Malthus was a better historian than prophet. He would be disappointed in that verdict because his intention in formulating his Theory of Population was to create a scientific basis for predicting the future state of mankind, in opposition to the speculations of utopian writers, especially Godwin. His failure to predict the Industrial Revolution is the evidence most often brought against him. But even with the benefit of hindsight, economic historians today still find it difficult to predict the Industrial Revolution from its antecedents. The crucial contribution of Malthus’s theory was not its pessimism about innovation but rather its prediction of the demographic consequences of technological change and the inevitable effect of population on the standard of living. Malthus’s Theory of Population continues to influence economic thought from popular discussion to policy-making, to model-building – long after many of its classical contemporaries, like the labour theory of value, have passed from the scene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Becker, G.S. 1981. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Easterlin, R.A. 1973. Relative economic status and the American fertility swing. In Family economic behavior: Problems and prospects, ed. E.B. Sheldon. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  3. Hatcher, J. 1977. Plague, population, and the english economy, 1348–1530. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee, R.D. 1981. Short-term variation: Vital rates, prices, and weather. In Wrigley and Schofield (1981), ch. 9.Google Scholar
  5. Malthus, T.R. 1798. An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society. With remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Meuvret, J. 1946. Les crises des subsistances et la démographie de la France de l’Ancien Régime. Population 1(4): 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mokyr, J. 1983. Why Ireland starved. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Preston, S.H. 1976. Mortality patterns in national populations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Weir, D.R. 1984. Rather never than late: Celibacy and age at marriage in English cohort fertility, 1541–1871. Journal of Family History 9(4): 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wrigley, E.A., and R. Schofield. 1981. The population history of England, 1541–1871: A reconstruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Weir
    • 1
  1. 1.