The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

International Capital Flows

  • Shang-Jin Wei
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1058

Abstract

Cross-border capital flows may be regarded as either too small (known as the Lucas paradox) or too big (against the Samuelson theorem of factor price equalization). The resolution to the conflicting views may require thinking out of the neoclassical box. In theory, international capital flows can promote economic growth, but the data do not reveal a strong, robust, and causal effect, particularly for developing countries. The theoretical results and the empirical patterns can be reconciled through either a composition effect or a threshold effect. Some emerging evidence suggests that the two effects are related.

Keywords

Composition hypothesis on capital flows Corruption Economic growth Factor price equalization theorem Financial globalization Foreign aid Foreign debt Foreign direct investment Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson model Institutional quality International capital asset pricing model (ICAPM) International capital flows Lucas paradox Portfolio equity flows Threshold hypothesis on capital flows Total factor productivity Trade costs 

JEL Classifications

F2 F3 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author is grateful to Andre Faria, Jiandong Ju, Ayhan Kose, Paolo Mauro, Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti, Romain Ranciere, Kenneth Rogoff, and Irina Tytell for helpful discussion, and Yuanyuan Chen and Patricia Medina for capable research and editorial assistance. The views expressed in this article are the authors own, and do not reflect those of the IMF or any other organization he is associated with.

Bibliography

  1. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. Robinson. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91: 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque, R. 2003. The composition of international capital flows: Risk sharing through foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics 1: 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfaro, L., S. Kalemli-Ozcan, and V. Volosovych. 2005. Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? An empirical investigation. Working paper no. 11901. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  4. Bekaert, G., C. Harvey, and C. Lundblad. 2005. Does financial liberalization spur growth? Journal of Financial Economics 77: 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borensztein, E., J. de Gregorio, and J.-W. Lee. 1998. How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics 45: 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brainard, W., and R. Cooper. 1968. Uncertainty and diversification of international trade. Food Research Institute Studies in Agricultural Economics, Trade, and Development 8: 257–285.Google Scholar
  7. Caballero, R., E. Farhi, and P.-O. Gourinchas. 2005. An equilibrium model of global imbalances and low interest rate. Working paper. MIT and UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
  8. Eichengreen, B. 2001. Capital account liberalization: What do cross-country studies tell us? World Bank Economic Review 15: 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faria, A., and P. Mauro. 2004. Institutions and the external capital structure of countries. Working paper no. 04/236. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  10. Frankel, J., and A. Rose. 1996. Currency crashes in emerging markets: An empirical treatment. Journal of International Economics 41: 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frankel, J., and S.-J. Wei. 2005. Managing macroeconomic crises: Policy lessons. In Managing economic volatility and crises: A practitioner’s guide, ed. J. Aizenman and B. Pinto. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gelos, G., and S.-J. Wei. 2005. Transparency and positions of international mutual funds. Journal of Finance 60: 2987–3020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gourinchas, P.-O., and O. Jeanne. 2004. On the benefits of capital account liberalization for emerging economies. Working paper. University of California, Berkeley, and the International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. 1991. Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review 35: 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hausmann, R., and E. Fernandez-Arias 2000. Foreign direct investment: Good cholesterol? Working paper no. 417. Research Department, Inter-America Development Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Henry, P. 2000. Stock market liberalization, economic reform, and emerging market equity prices. Journal of Finance 55: 529–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Imbs, J., and R. Wacziang. 2003. Stages of diversification. American Economic Review 93: 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2002. International investment position: A guide to data sources. Online. Available at www.imf.org/external/np/sta/iip/guide/ index.htm. Accessed 11 May 2006.
  19. Ju, J., and S.-J. Wei. 2006. A solution to two paradoxes of international capital flows. NBER working paper, forthcoming. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  20. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2003. Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996–2002. Policy research working paper no. 3106. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Kose, M., E. Prasad, K. Rogoff, and S.-J. Wei. 2006. Financial globalization: A reappraisal and synthesis. Prepared for the Journal of Economic Literature.Google Scholar
  22. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lane, P., and G. Milesi-Ferreti. 2001. The external wealth of nations: Measures of foreign assets and liabilities for industrial and developing nations. Journal of International Economics 55: 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lane, P., and G. Milesi-Ferreti. 2005. The external wealth of nations mark II: Revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities, 1970–2004. Working paper no. 06/69. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  25. Levine, R. 1996. Foreign banks, financial development, and economic growth. In International financial markets: Harmonization versus competition, ed. C. Barfield. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
  26. Levine, R. 2005. Finance and growth: Theory and evidence. In Handbook of economic growth, ed. P. Aghion and S. Durlauf. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  27. Lucas, R. 1990. Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? American Economic Review 80: 92–96.Google Scholar
  28. Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff. 2001. The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: Is there a common cause? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15: 339–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Papaioannou, E. 2005. What drives international bank flows? Politics, institutions and other determinants. Working paper no. 437. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  31. Prasad, E., K. Rogoff, S.-J. Wei, and M. Kose. 2003. Effects of financial globalization on developing countries: Some empirical evidence, Occasional paper no. 220. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  32. Radelet, S., and J. Sachs. 1998. The east Asian financial crisis: Diagnosis, remedies, and prospects. Brookings Papers on Economic Activities 1998 (1): 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rajan, R., and A. Subramanian. 2005. What undermines aid’s impact on growth? Working paper no. 05/126. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  34. Reinhart, C., and K. Rogoff. 2004. Serial default and the ‘paradox’ of rich to poor capital flows. American Economic Review 94 (2): 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodrik, D., and A. Velasco. 1999. Short-term capital flows. Working paper no. 7364. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  36. Samuelson, P. 1948. International trade and equalization of factor prices. Economic Journal 58: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smarzynska, B., and S.-J. Wei 2000. Corruption and the composition of foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence. Working paper no. 7969. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  38. Stulz, R. 1999. Globalization of equity markets and the cost of capital. Working paper no. 7021. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  39. Tytell, I., and S.-J. Wei. 2004. Does financial globalization induce better macroeconomic policies? Working paper no. 04/84. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  40. Wei, S.-J. 2000a. How taxing is corruption on international investors? Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wei, S.-J. 2000b. Local corruption and global capital flows. Brookings Papers on Economic Activities 2000 (2): 303–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wei, S.-J. 2001. Domestic crony capitalism and international fickle capital: Is there a connection? International Finance 4: 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei, S.-J. 2006. Connecting two views on financial globalization: Can we make further progress? Working paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shang-Jin Wei
    • 1
  1. 1.