Skip to main content

Neo-structuralism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Neo-structuralism is a heterodox approach to economic development. It emerged in Latin America, in the 1980s, in the context of the Debt Crisis, the spread of neoliberalism and financial globalization, as an updated version of the ECLAC’s Structuralist approach to development. Neo-structuralism deepened the analysis on structural heterogeneity, and its implications for the design of macroeconomic and productive development policies, seeking to promote an inclusive development path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This collection of essays of several authors was the result of a research project led by Osvaldo Sunkel in the late 1980s. A Spanish version was published in 1991.

References

  • Agosin, M.R. 2007. Trade and growth: Why Asia grows faster than Latin America. In Economic growth with equity: Challenges for Latin America (2007), ed. R. Ffrench-Davis and J.L. Machinea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bárcena, A., and A. Prado, eds. 2016. Neo-structuralism and heterodox thinking in Latin America and the Caribbean in the early twenty-first century, ECLAC books no. 132. Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielschowsky, R. 2009. Sixty years of ECLAC: structuralism and neo-structuralism. CEPAL Review, No. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielschowsky, R., and M. Torres, comps. 2018. Desarrollo e igualdad: el pensamiento de la CEPAL en su séptimo decenio. Textos seleccionados del período 2008–2018, Colección 70 años, N° 1, Santiago: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitar, S. 1988. Neo-liberalism versus neo-structuralism in Latin America. CEPAL Review, N° 34, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., G. Dell’Ariccia, and P. Mauro. 2010. Rethinking macroeconomic policy. IMF Staff position note, SPN/10/03, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G., and E. Mendoza. 2000. Rational contagion and the globalization of securities markets. Journal of International Economics 51 (1): 79–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. 2002. Kicking away the Ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, R. 1989. Debt and crisis in Latin America: The supply side of the story. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Alejandro, C. F. (1985), “Goodbye financial repression, hello financial crash”, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 19, N° 1/2: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 1990. Changing production patterns with social equity: The prime task of Latin America and the Caribbean development in the 1990s. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 1992. Social equity and changing production patterns: An integrated approach. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 1995. Policies to improve linkages with the world economy, ECLAC books, no. 40. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 2002. Globalization and development. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 2008. Structural change and productivity growth 20 years later: Old problems, new opportunities. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 2010. Time for equality: Closing gaps, opening trails. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 2018. The inefficiency of inequality. Santiago: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, F. 1983. La industrialización trunca de América Latina. Ciudad de México: Editorial Nueva Imagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, F. 1990. Industrialization in Latin America: From “the black box” to the “empty box”: A comparison of contemporary industrialization patterns. Santiago: Cuadernos de la CEPAL No. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R. 1985. Neoestructuralismo e inserción externa. Prepared for Round Table on Development Styles and Challenges for Latin America, organized by ECLAC, FLACSO-Chile, and UNITAR, January 6–8, 1986, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R. 1988. An outline of a neo-structuralist approach. CEPAL Review, N° 34, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R. 2005. Reforming Latin American economies: After market fundamentalism. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R. 2010a. Macroeconomics for development: from financierism to productivism. CEPAL Review, No. 102, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R. 2010b. Economic reforms in Chile: From dictatorship to democracy. London/New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R., and J.A. Ocampo. 2001. The globalization of financial volatility. In Crisis in ‘successful’ emerging economies, ed. R. Ffrench-Davis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, R. 2008. The competitive real exchange-rate, inflation and monetary policy. CEPAL Review, No 96, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, R., and M. Rapetti. 2014. The real exchange rate as a target of macroeconomic policy. MPRA paper no 59335, October. http://mpra.ub-muenchen.de/59335/

  • Gallagher, K. 2014. Ruling capital: Emerging markets and the reregulation of cross-border finance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith-Jones, S., J.A. Ocampo, and J. Stiglitz, eds. 2010. Time for a visible hand: Lessons from the 2008 World Financial Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. 2010. Market-oriented reforms, domestic technological capabilities and Economic development in Latin America. In The rise of technological power in the south, ed. Xiolan Fu and L. Soete. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C., and R.N. Gwynne. 2000. Relevance of structuralism and dependency theories in the neoliberal period: A Latin American perspective. Journal of Developing Societies 16 (1): 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. 2012. End this depression now! New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, N. 1988. Del Estructuralismo al Neoestructuralismo, Colección Estudios CIEPLAN 23. In Neostructuralism, neomonetarism and adjustment processes, ed. P. Meller. Boulder: Westview Press. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. 1982. Can “it” happen again? Essays on instability and finance. Nueva York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J. A. 2011. Macroeconomy for development: Countercyclical policies and production sector transformation. CEPAL Review, No. 104, ECLAC, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J.A. 2016. Balance of payments dominance: Implications for macroeconomic policies. In Macroeconomics and development: Roberto Frenkel and the Economies of Latin America, ed. M. Damill, M. Rapetti, and G. Rozenwurcel. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J.A. 2017a. Dynamic efficiency: Structural dynamics and economic growth in developing countries. In Efficiency, finance, and varieties of industrial policy, ed. A. Noman and J.E. Stiglitz. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J.A. 2017b. Resetting the international monetary (non) system. Oxford/Helsinki: Oxford University Press and UNU-WIDER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J.A., and J. Ros, eds. 2011. The Oxford handbook of Latin American economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, J., P. Loungani, and D. Furceri. 2016. Neoliberalism: Oversold? IMF Finance & Development 53(2), June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Caldentey, E. 2016. A time to reflect on opportunities for debate and dialogue between (neo)structuralism and heterodox schools of thought, in Neostructuralism and heterodox thinking in Latin America and the Caribbean in the early twenty-first century, Bárcena, A and Prado, A (eds.), ECLAC Books No. 132, 31–83, Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, A. 1970. Naturaleza e implicaciones de la “heterogeneidad estructural” de la América Latina. El Trimestre Económico 37 (1): 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. 1961. Economic development, planning and international cooperation. Santiago: Naciones Unidas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. 1964. Nueva política comercial para el desarrollo. Fondo de Cultura Económica: México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, J., and O. Sunkel. 1993. Toward a Neostructuralist synthesis: , in Development from within: Toward a neostructuralist approach for Latin America. Osvaldo Sunkel (editor), 5–19, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, O. 2006. El estructuralismo latinoamericano, Ciudad de México, Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 1998. Who needs capital account convertibility? Should the IMF pursue capital account convertibility? In Princeton essays in international finance, No. 207, ed. P. Kenen. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2007. What produces economic success. In Economic Growth with equity, ed. R. Ffrench-Davis and J.L. Machinea. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2011. The globalization paradox. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosales, O. 1988. An assessment of the structuralist paradigm in Latin American development and the prospects for its renovation. CEPAL Review, N° 34, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. 2000. Capital market liberalization, economic growth, and instability. World Development 28 (6): 1075–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, O. 1993. Development from within: Toward a neostructuralist approach for Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, O., and R. Infante, eds. 2009. Hacia un desarrollo inclusivo: el caso de Chile. Santiago: CEPAL/Chile Veintiuno/FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titelman, D., and E. Pérez Caldentey. 2016. Macroeconomics for development in Latin America and the Caribbean: New thoughts on countercyclicality. In Neostructuralism and heterodox thinking in Latin America and the Caribbean in the early twenty-first century, ECLAC books no. 132, ed. A. Bárcena and A. Prado. Santiago: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2007. Follow-up to and implementation of the outcome of the International Conference on Financing for Development: Report of the Secretary-General, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. 2000. Exchange rate regimes for emerging markets: reviving the intermediate option. Policy analyses in international economics 60. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Ffrench-Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Limited

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ffrench-Davis, R., Torres, M. (2021). Neo-structuralism. In: Vernengo, M., Caldentey, E.P., Rosser Jr, B.J. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3122-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3122-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics