Skip to main content

Greek Crisis in Perspective: Origins, Effects and Ways-Out

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

In 2011 the Euro faced its toughest challenge since its introduction as several of the participating Member States faced unprecedented financial problems. Greece was the most severe case requiring intervention from the EU and IMF to stabilize its economy and repay debt obligations. This article explains the debt process in Greece from the 1980s to date, and describes its main causes and episodes. It also assesses the IMF-EU Memorandum and argues that the collapse of growth inhibits the prospects of debt stabilization. An alternative scenario is discussed showing that stabilization can become more effective and realistic if recession is tackled first and reforms follow on a steadier path.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Online edition, 2012. Edited by Palgrave Macmillan

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bayoumi, T., and Barry, Eichengreen. 1992. Shocking aspects of European monetary unification. CEPR discussion paper no. 643, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. 2006. Current account deficits in rich countries. IMF Mundell-Fleming Lecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., and F. Giavazzi. 2002. Current account deficits in the Euro area: The end of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 33: 147–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, N. 1994. Fiscal developments in Greece 1980–93: A critical review. European Economy: Towards Greater Fiscal Discipline 3: 97–134.Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, N. 2009. Ten years of EMU: Convergence, divergence and new priorities. National Institute Economic Review 208: 86–100.London

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, N. 2010. Crisis, threats and ways out for the Greek economy. Cyprus Economic Policy Review 4(1): 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, N. 2012. Market reforms in Greece 1990–2008: Domestic limitations and external discipline. In Market reforms in Greece, ed. Kalyvas, S. and G. Pagoulatos. Columbia University Press (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, N., and V. Sarantides. 2011. External asymmetries in the Euro area and the role of foreign direct investment, Bank of Greece. Discussion paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, Paul. 2010. The Greek crisis and the future of the eurozone. Intereconomics 2: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2009. Quarterly report on the Euro area 8(1), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Economy. 2011. The economic adjustment programme for Greece: Fifth review. Occasional papers 87, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Economy. 2012. The second adjustment programme for Greece: Fifth review. Occasional papers 94, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin. 2012. The failure of the Euro: The little currency that couldn’t. Foreign Affairs 91(1): 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. 2011. Greece: Third review under the stand-by arrangement. International Monetary Fund, Country Report No. 11/68, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 2011. Origins of the euro crisis, blog “The Conscience of a Liberal,” 23 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memorandum, II. 2012. Memorandum of understanding on specific economic policy conditionality, 9 February 2012. Available at http://www.hellenicparliament.gr

  • Shelburne, R.C. 2008. Current account deficits in European emerging markets. UN discussion paper, no. 2008. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skouras, S., and Christodoulakis, N. 2011. Electoral misgovernance cycles: Evidence from wildfires and tax evasion in Greece and elsewhere. LSE, Hellenic Observatory. GreeSE paper no. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehrkamp, R. 2011. Who’s next? The Eurozone in an insolvency trap. Bertelsmann Stiftung, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I have benefited from various comments by V. Sarantides and A. Ntantzopoulos and I am also thankful to participants in a LSE seminar on an earlier version of the paper.

Disclaimer Views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, without implicating or representing any other person or organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicos Christodoulakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: A Brief Description of the Conditionality Programs for Greece

Appendix: A Brief Description of the Conditionality Programs for Greece

The adjustment program for Greece was laid out in three phases. The first Memorandum was signed in May 2010 and aimed at reducing the fiscal deficit to 3% in 2013. Specific measures that were actually implemented included universal cuts in public salaries and all pensions, a rise in VAT from 19% to 23% and similarly in other consumption surcharges, the abolition of collective agreements in favor of firm-level contracts, the lowering of private sector wages by 12% and a reform in the Social Security system. It also included the liberalization of red-tape practices in the transport sector, pharmacists and lawyers, but the outcome was heavily compromised through a series of delays and back offs. Fiscal deficit for 2010 ended up close to 11% of GDP, substantially lower than the horrendous 15.4% in the year before but still away from the initially set target.

Thus, in early 2011 a new round of negotiations resulted in a second round of measures voted by Parliament in June 2011. They included further taxation on past incomes, a lump-sum tax on professionals, further rises in indirect taxes and a new property levy that was imposed two months later. The program demanded the abolition of outdated public entities, the reduction in the number of civil servants and a further curtailment in their salaries. It also envisaged ambitious privatizations on utilities and public real-estate that could trim down public debt by Euro 50 bn within a four-year period. Fiscal deficit for 2011 is provisionally estimated to be 9.8% of GDP, revealing a major difficulty in further adjustment in the absence of growth.

The third round of adjustments was voted for in February 2012 as Memorandum II. (For the full text see “Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality”, 9 February 2012, available at http://www.hellenicparliament.gr).

This time it was approved by the two major parties, but only after a line-up was imposed to avoid desertions and rising internal protest. Measures included a reduction of minimum wages in the private sector by 22%, an additional cut by 10% to new entrants as a means to beat youth unemployment, 15% cuts in various pensions, the abolition of several tax credits and explicit targets for cutting employment and entities in the wider public sector. Policies will start to be implemented in the final quarter of 2012.

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Christodoulakis, N. (2012). Greek Crisis in Perspective: Origins, Effects and Ways-Out. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2939-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2939-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics