Abstract
Multiplicity of equilibria implies that the relationship between the outcome variable and the exogenous variables characterising a model is a correspondence rather than a function. This results in an incomplete econometric model. Incompleteness complicates identification and statistical inference on functionals of the probability distribution of the population of interest. This is because it implies that the sampling process and the maintained assumptions may be consistent with a set of values for these functionals, rather than with a single one. As a result, the econometric analysis of models with multiple equilibria needs to either: (1) rely on simplifying assumptions that shift focus to outcome features that are common across equilibria; or (2) augment the model with a “selection mechanism” that chooses the equilibrium played in the regions of multiplicity; or (3) maintain only minimal assumptions that partially identify the functionals of interest. Each of these approaches is reviewed, focusing on static game theoretic models.
This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Online edition, 2010. Edited by Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliography
Andrews, D.W.K., S.T. Berry, and P. Jia. 2004. Confidence regions for parameters in discrete games with multiple equilibria, with an application to discount chain store location, mimeo.
Aradillas-Lopez, A., and E. Tamer. 2008. The identification power of equilibrium in simple games. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 26(3): 261–310.
Bajari, P., H. Hong, and S. Ryan. 2009. Identification and estimation of a discrete game of complete information. Econometrica (forthcoming).
Beresteanu, A., I.S. Molchanov, and F. Molinari. 2008. Sharp identification regions in games. CeMMAP working paper CWP15/08.
Beresteanu, A., I.S.Molchanov, and F. Molinari. 2009. Sharp identification regions in models with convex predictions: Games, individual choice, and incomplete data. CeMMAP working paper CWP27/09.
Berry, S.T. 1992. Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica 60(4): 889–917.
Berry, S.T., and E. Tamer. 2007. Identification in models of oligopoly entry, Chap. 2. In Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and application, Ninth world congress, vol. II, 46–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bjorn, P.A., and Q.H. Vuong. 1985. Simultaneous equations models for dummy endogenous variables: A game theoretic formulation with an application to labor force participation. CalTech DHSS working paper number 557.
Blundell, R., and J.R. Smith. 1994. Coherency and estimation in simultaneous models with censored or qualitative dependent variables. Journal of Econometrics 64: 355–373.
Borzekowski, R., and A.M. Cohen. 2005. Estimating strategic complementarities in credit unions’ outsourcing decisions. Working paper, Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
Bresnahan, T.F., and P.C. Reiss. 1988. Do entry conditions vary across markets. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 833–871.
Bresnahan, T.F., and P.C. Reiss. 1990. Entry in monopoly markets. Review of Economic Studies 57: 531–553.
Bresnahan, T.F., and P.C. Reiss. 1991a. Empirical models of discrete games. Journal of Econometrics 48: 57–82.
Bresnahan, T.F., and P.C. Reiss. 1991b. Entry and competition in concentrated markets. Journal of Political Economy 99(5): 977–1009.
Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2001. Discrete choice with social interactions. Review of Economic Studies 68: 235–260.
Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2007. Identification of binary choice models with social interactions. Journal of Econometrics 140: 52–75.
Chernozhukov, V., H. Hong, and E. Tamer. 2007. Estimation and confidence regions for parameter sets in econometric models. Econometrica 75: 1243–1284.
Ciliberto, F., and E. Tamer. 2009. Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Econometrica (forthcoming).
Galichon, A., and M. Henry. 2008. Inference in models with multiple equilibria, mimeo.
Gourieroux, C., J.J. Laffont, and A. Monfort. 1980. Coherency conditions in simultaneous linear equation models with endogenous switching regimes. Econometrica 48: 675–695.
Heckman, J. 1978. Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46: 931–959.
Jia, P. 2008. What happens when Wal-Mart comes to town: An empirical analysis of the discount retailing industry. Econometrica 76: 1263–1316.
Jovanovic, B. 1989. Observable implications of models with multiple equilibria. Econometrica 57: 1431–1437.
Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mazzeo, M. 2002. Product choice and oligopoly market structure. RAND Journal of Economics 33(2): 221–242.
Molchanov, I.S. 2005. Theory of random sets. London: Springer.
Schmidt, P. 1981. Constraints on the parameters in simultaneous tobit and probit models, Chap. 12. In Structural analysis of discrete data and econometric applications, ed. C. Manski and D. McFadden, 422–434. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sweeting, A. 2008. The strategic timing of radio commercials: An empirical analysis using multiple equilibria. RAND Journal of Economics (forthcoming).
Tamer, E. 2003. Incomplete simultaneous discrete response model with multiple equilibria. Review of Economic Studies 70: 147–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 The Author(s)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Molinari, F. (2010). Econometric Issues in the Presence of Multiple Equilibria. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2903-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2903-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences