Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regional Development, Geography of

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

New theoretical work on spatial concentration of industry – particularly the ‘new economic geography’ – has significantly helped our understanding why some regions develop more than others, why cities arise and where they are located. However, this work rarely incorporates Adam Smith’s observation that spatial differences in economic activity also reflect variations in physical geography, which make some places more productive than others at particular times; nor has it accommodated regional development policy – the use of economic incentives to attract industry to particular locations. A full theory of regional development would integrate theories of agglomeration economies with physical geography and with public economics.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bairoch, P. 1988. Cities and economics development: From the dawn of history to the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., R. Forslid, P. Martin, G. Ottaviano, and F. Robert-Nicoud. 2003. Economic geography and public policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D., and J.D. Sachs. 1998. Geography, demography, and economic growth in Africa. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1998(2): 207–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., M.P. Feldman, and M. Gertler. 2000. The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.R., and D.E. Weinstein. 1998. Market access, economic geography, and comparative advantage: An empirical assessment, Working paper no. 6787. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., and D.E. Weinstein. 1999. Economic geography and regional production structure: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review 43: 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demurger, S., J.D. Sachs, T.-W. Wing, S. Bao, G. Chang, and A. Mellinger. 2002. Geography, economic policy, and regional development in China. Asian Economic Papers 1: 146–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., and J.E. Stiglitz. 1977. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (ed.). 2002. Regions, globalization, and the knowledge-based economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., and F. Shilpi. 2003. The spatial division of labor in Nepal. Journal of Development Studies 39(6): 23–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. 1995. Towards the learning region. Futures 27: 527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A.J. Venables. 1999. The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, J.L., and J.D. Sachs. 2000. Agriculture, climate, and technology: Why are the tropics falling behind? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 731–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, J.L., J.D. Sachs, and A.D. Mellinger. 1999. Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review 22: 179–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E.L. 2005. Urban colossus: Why is New York America’s largest city? Working paper no. 11398. Washington, DC: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., and D. Mare. 1994. Cities and skills. Working paper no. E94-11, Hoover Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G.H. 2005. Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics 67: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.V. 1988. Urban development: Theory, fact, and illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.V., and J.-F. Thisse (eds.). 2004. Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol. 4. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellinger, A.D., J.D. Sachs, and J.L. Gallup. 2000. Climate, coastal proximity, and development. In Oxford handbook of economic geography, ed. G.L. Clark, M.P. Feldman, and M.S. Gertler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midelfart-Knarvik, K., and F. Steen. 1999. Self-reinforcing agglomerations? An empirical industry study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101: 515–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., H.G. Overnman, S.J. Redding, and A.J. Venables. 2000. The location of European industry, Economic papers no. 142. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, B. 2005. City economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Overman, H.G., and D. Puga. 2002. Unemployment clusters across European regions and countries. Economic Policy 34: 115–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1995. The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review 73: 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1998a. Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments and institutions. In On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1998b. The microeconomic foundations of economic development. In Global competitiveness report 1998, ed. World Economic Forum. Geneva: WEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J., and J.D. Sachs. 2003. The United States as a coastal nation. Journal of Economic Growth 8: 5–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D., N. Bajpai, and A. Ramiah. 2002. Understanding regional economic growth in India. Asian Economic Papers 1(3): 32–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A.L. 2006. The new argonauts: Regional advantages in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Thünen, J.H. 1826. Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg. Trans V.M. Wartenberg as Von Thünen’s isolated state. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. http://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5

    Jeffrey D. Sachs & Gordon C. McCord

Authors
  1. Jeffrey D. Sachs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gordon C. McCord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

    Copyright information

    © 2008 The Author(s)

    About this entry

    Cite this entry

    Sachs, J.D., McCord, G.C. (2008). Regional Development, Geography of. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2753-1

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2753-1

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

    • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

    • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation