Skip to main content

Schumpeterian Growth and Growth Policy Design

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

Schumpeterian growth theory features quality-improving innovations that displace previous technologies, and are motivated by prospective monopoly rents. It predicts, first, that a higher rate of growth should be associated with a higher rate of firm entry and exit, and that exit can enhance productivity growth; second, that some countries may converge to the technological frontier whereas others may diverge; third, that a given policy will have contrasting effects on sectors or countries at different distances from the frontier, and therefore growth policy must be adapted accordingly. In particular, entry and delicensing enhance growth more the closer sectors or countries are to the technological frontier.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, and F. Zilibotti. 2006. Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association 4: 37–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt. 2005d. Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 701–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt, and S. Prantl. 2004. Entry and productivity growth: evidence from micro-level panel data. Journal of the European Economic Association 2: 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., and Prantl, S. 2005c. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Working Paper No. 12027. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., R. Burgess, S. Redding, and F. Zilibotti. 2005a. Entry liberalization and inequality in industrial performance. Journal of the European Economic Association 3: 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1998. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., P. Howitt, and D. Mayer-Foulkes. 2005b. The effect of financial development on convergence: theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 173–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, M. 1962. The production function in allocation and growth:A synthesis. American Economic Review 52: 995–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, J., and P. Howitt. 2006. Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 39: 733–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. 1993. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61: 1247–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, P., and D. Mayer-Foulkes. 2005. R&D, implementation and stagnation: A Schumpeterian theory of convergence clubs. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 37: 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. 1996. Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy 104: 724–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, G., and S. Scarpetta. 2003. Regulation, productivity and growth. Economic Policy 36: 11–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy 98: 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A., et al. 2003. An agenda for a growing Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. 1988. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Aghion, P. (2008). Schumpeterian Growth and Growth Policy Design. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2698-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2698-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics