Skip to main content

Purification

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Many complete information games have equilibria only in mixed strategies, where players are required to randomize over pure strategies among which they are indifferent according to a fixed probability distribution. Harsanyi showed that, if such a game were perturbed – with each player observing an idiosyncratic independent payoff shock with continuous support – then the perturbed games will have pure strategy equilibria which will converge to the mixed strategy equilibrium as the perturbations become small. We review the strong conditions on perturbations under which Harsanyi’s result holds and discuss weaker conditions on perturbations which ensure the existence of pure strategy equilibria without approximating all mixed equilibria of the unperturbed game.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aumann, R. 1974. Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R., Y. Katznelson, R. Radner, R. Rosenthal, and B. Weiss. 1983. Approximate purification of mixed strategies. Mathematics of Operations Research 8: 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, V. 1998. Informational constraints and overlapping generations model: Folk and anti-folk theorems. Review of Economic Studies 65: 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, V. 2000. The robustness of repeated game equilibria to incomplete payoff information. Mimeo: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, V., G. Mailath, and S. Morris. 2006. Purification in the infinitely-repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma. Discussion paper no. 1571, Cowles Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, H., and E. van Damme. 1993. Global games and equilibrium selection. Econometrica 61: 989–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, S., P. Reny, and A. Robson. 2003. A short proof of Harsanyi’s purification th. Games and Economic Behavior 45: 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. 1973. Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points. International Journal of Games Theory 2: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and R. Weber. 1985. Distributional strategies for games with incomplete information. Mathematics of Operations Research 10: 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R., and R. Rosenthal. 1982. Private information and pure-strategy equilibria. Mathematics of Operations Research 7: 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reny, P., and A. Robson. 2004. Reinterpreting mixed strategy equilibria: A unification of the classical and Bayesian views. Games and Economic Behavior 48: 355–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. 1973. Equilibrium points of non-atomic games. Journal of Statistical Physics 7: 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E. 1991. The stability and perfection of nash equilibria. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Morris, S. (2008). Purification. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2679-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2679-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics