Research on addiction had already yielded a wide range of interesting and important findings when economists first arrived on the scene. The economic study of addiction was initiated by a seminal paper by Becker and Murphy (1988) which challenged the prevailing view of addiction as self-destructive, proposing instead a ‘rational account of addiction’. Although some empirical research has confirmed the model’s critical prediction that anticipated increases in future prices will decrease current demand for a drug, more recent research by economists, stimulated by the prior work from other disciplines, has challenged some of the rational account’s assumption and predictions.
KeywordsAddiction, rational account of Becker, G. Drugs Excise tax Forward price elasticity Rational behaviour Sin taxes Time consistency
We thank Caroline Acker, Ted O’Donoghue and Antonio Rangel for helpful suggestions.
- Gardner, E., and D. James. 1999. The neurobiology of chemical addiction. In Getting hooked: Rationality and addiction, ed. J. Elster and O.-J. Skog. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gruber, J., and S. Mullainathan. 2005. Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy 5: 1–43.Google Scholar
- Loewenstein, G. 1999. A visceral account of addiction. In Getting hooked: Rationality and addiction, ed. J. Elster and O.-J. Skog. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Donoghue, T., and M. Rabin. 1997. Addiction and self control. In Addiction: Entries and exits, ed. J. Elster. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Robins, L. 1973. The Vietnam drug user returns. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Wertenbroch, K. 2003. Self-rationing: Self-control in consumer choice. In Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice, ed. G. Loewenstein, D. Read, and R. Baumeister. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar