Abstract
For Marx, the labour theory of value was not a theory of price, but a method for measuring the exploitation of labour. The exploitation of labour, in turn, was important for explaining the production of a surplus in a capitalist economy. In a feudal economy, the emergence of a net product, surplus to the consumption of producers and to the inputs consumed in production, was palpable. For the serf reproduced himself on his family plot of land during part of the week, and then worked for the lord, doing demesne or corvée labour during the other part. There was a temporal and physical division between production for subsistence or reproduction, and production which generated an economic surplus and was appropriated by the lord. Under capitalism, with the division of labour, such a demarcation no longer existed. If capitalism is characterized by competitive markets, where each factor is paid its true ‘value’, and no one makes a windfall profit by cheating his partner in exchange, how could a surplus emerge? In what manner could a sequence of equal exchanges transform an initial set of inputs into a larger quantity of outputs, with the surplus being appropriated systematically by one class, the capitalists? Marx’s project was to explain the origin of profits in a perfectly competitive model, where each factor, including labour, received its competitive price in exchange.
JEL Classifications
This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Bibliography
Bardhan, P. 1984. Land, labor and rural poverty: Essays in development economics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1981. Structure and practice in the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics 12 (4): 1–26.
Cohen, G.A. 1979. The labor theory of value and the concept of exploitation. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (4): 338–360.
Elster, J. 1985. Making sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geras, N. 1985. The controversy about Marx and justice. New Left Review 150: 47–85.
Morishima, M. 1973. Marx’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roemer, J.E. 1981. Analytical foundations of Marxian economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roemer, J.E. 1982. A general theory of exploitation and class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roemer, J.E. 1985a. Value, exploitation, and class. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Roemer, J.E. 1985b. Should Marxists be interested in exploitation? Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1): 30–65.
Samuelson, P. 1982. The normative and positivistic inferiority of Marx’s values paradigm. Southern Economic Journal 49 (1): 11–18.
Vegara, J.M. 1979. Economia politica y modelos multisectoriales. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
Wright, E.O. 1985. Classes. London: New Left Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 The Author(s)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Roemer, J.E. (2008). Marxian Value Analysis. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1001-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1001-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Marxian Value Analysis- Published:
- 25 March 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1001-2
-
Original
Marxian Value Analysis- Published:
- 08 November 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1001-1